Bond Strength and Adhesive Interface Quality of New Pre‐Mixed Bioceramic Root Canal Sealer

To evaluate the bond strength and adhesive interface quality between root dentin and pre-mixed bioceramic sealers: AH Plus Bioceramic, Bio-C Sealer, and NeoSEALER Flo. Thirty-six single-rooted teeth were endodontically treated and divided into three groups (n = 12) based on the sealer used: GI-AH Plus Bioceramic; GII-Bio-C Sealer; GIII-NeoSEALER Flo. Fluorescein dye was added to two samples of each group. After three times the sealer's setting time, specimens were sectioned. The first and second slices underwent push-out testing with failure pattern analysis (n = 10). The third slice was used for confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) (n = 10). Samples with dye were analyzed using confocal laser scanning fluorescence microscopy (CLSM). Data were analyzed using ANOVA, χ<sup>2</sup>, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. The two-way ANOVA t revealed significant differences for the sealer factor, with Bio-C Sealer showing the highest bond strength (2.61 ± 1.58), followed by NeoSEALER Flo (1.76 ± 1.30) and AH Plus Bioceramic (1.37 ± 1.44). NeoSEALER Flo showed values similar to AH Plus Bioceramic and Bio-C Sealer. The χ<sup>2</sup> test revealed a significant difference in failure type across root thirds, with adhesive and cohesive failures more common in the apical third. No significant differences were found between sealers or root thirds for penetrability. Bio-C Sealer exhibited the highest bond strength, while NeoSEALER Flo showed intermediate results. Both Bio-C Sealer and NeoSEALER Flo demonstrated superior adhesive interface adaptation, with no significant differences in penetrability among sealers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microscopy Research and Technique
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.24827
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bond Strength and Adhesive Interface Quality of New Pre‐Mixed Bioceramic Root Canal Sealer

Bruna Monteiro de Barros Ciribelli Alves, Jardel Francisco Mazzi‐Chaves, Manoel Damião Sousa‐Neto, Fabiane Carneiro Lopes‐Olhê et al.
7 citations
Microscopy Research and Technique
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
12.53
article

Bond Strength and Adhesive Interface Quality of New Pre‐Mixed Bioceramic Root Canal Sealer

Bruna Monteiro de Barros Ciribelli Alves, Jardel Francisco Mazzi‐Chaves, Manoel Damião Sousa‐Neto, Fabiane Carneiro Lopes‐Olhê, Helena Cristina de Assis, Karen Gisselle Garay Villamayor, Gustavo Creazzo
article en
7 citations

Abstract

To evaluate the bond strength and adhesive interface quality between root dentin and pre-mixed bioceramic sealers: AH Plus Bioceramic, Bio-C Sealer, and NeoSEALER Flo. Thirty-six single-rooted teeth were endodontically treated and divided into three groups (n = 12) based on the sealer used: GI-AH Plus Bioceramic; GII-Bio-C Sealer; GIII-NeoSEALER Flo. Fluorescein dye was added to two samples of each group. After three times the sealer's setting time, specimens were sectioned. The first and second slices underwent push-out testing with failure pattern analysis (n = 10). The third slice was used for confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) (n = 10). Samples with dye were analyzed using confocal laser scanning fluorescence microscopy (CLSM). Data were analyzed using ANOVA, χ<sup>2</sup>, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. The two-way ANOVA t revealed significant differences for the sealer factor, with Bio-C Sealer showing the highest bond strength (2.61 ± 1.58), followed by NeoSEALER Flo (1.76 ± 1.30) and AH Plus Bioceramic (1.37 ± 1.44). NeoSEALER Flo showed values similar to AH Plus Bioceramic and Bio-C Sealer. The χ<sup>2</sup> test revealed a significant difference in failure type across root thirds, with adhesive and cohesive failures more common in the apical third. No significant differences were found between sealers or root thirds for penetrability. Bio-C Sealer exhibited the highest bond strength, while NeoSEALER Flo showed intermediate results. Both Bio-C Sealer and NeoSEALER Flo demonstrated superior adhesive interface adaptation, with no significant differences in penetrability among sealers.

Microscopy Research and TechniqueVol. 88(7)
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
12.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.