Criterion-Related Validity and Reliability of the Front Plank Test in Adults: The ADULT-FIT Project

Background: the validity and reliability of the front plank test (FPT) have been studied in young adults but not in adults aged 34 to 60 years. The aim of this study was to analyze the criterion-related validity and reliability of the front plank test (FPT) for evaluating trunk musculature in adults according to sex and age groups. Methods: a repeated measures design was used to study the reliability of the FPT. A total of 84 adults aged 18–62 years performed trunk muscular force tests and the FPT. Criterion-related validity was assessed using repeated measures ANOVA. Reliability was examined by ICC, error measurements, and Bland–Altman analysis across sex and age groups. Results: significant differences in the activation of the rectus abdominis and external oblique muscles were found compared with the erector spinae and multifidus muscles (p < 0.001). No correlations were found between FPT time and physical activity or rate of perceived exertion at the end (p > 0.05). Low and moderate correlations were found with body fat percentage, trunk fat mass percentage, and external oblique, regardless of sex and age groups (p < 0.05). Extremely high reliability was found regardless of sex and age groups (ICC > 0.98), with low error measurements (RMSE = 11.93–18.73; %CV = 4.91–6.33; SEE = 11.45–16.84). MDC90 values indicated no real change between T1 and T2. Conclusion: FPT is a valid and reliable test for assessing trunk musculature in adults regardless of sex and age groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15052722
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Criterion-Related Validity and Reliability of the Front Plank Test in Adults: The ADULT-FIT Project

Magdalena Cuenca‐García, Maximiliano Torres-Banduc, Sandra Sánchez‐Parente, Ángela Rodríguez‐Perea et al.
4 citations
Applied Sciences
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
5.58
article

Criterion-Related Validity and Reliability of the Front Plank Test in Adults: The ADULT-FIT Project

Magdalena Cuenca‐García, Maximiliano Torres-Banduc, Sandra Sánchez‐Parente, Ángela Rodríguez‐Perea, José Castro‐Piñero, Carolina Cruz-León, Pedro Aragón-Aragón
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Background: the validity and reliability of the front plank test (FPT) have been studied in young adults but not in adults aged 34 to 60 years. The aim of this study was to analyze the criterion-related validity and reliability of the front plank test (FPT) for evaluating trunk musculature in adults according to sex and age groups. Methods: a repeated measures design was used to study the reliability of the FPT. A total of 84 adults aged 18–62 years performed trunk muscular force tests and the FPT. Criterion-related validity was assessed using repeated measures ANOVA. Reliability was examined by ICC, error measurements, and Bland–Altman analysis across sex and age groups. Results: significant differences in the activation of the rectus abdominis and external oblique muscles were found compared with the erector spinae and multifidus muscles (p < 0.001). No correlations were found between FPT time and physical activity or rate of perceived exertion at the end (p > 0.05). Low and moderate correlations were found with body fat percentage, trunk fat mass percentage, and external oblique, regardless of sex and age groups (p < 0.05). Extremely high reliability was found regardless of sex and age groups (ICC > 0.98), with low error measurements (RMSE = 11.93–18.73; %CV = 4.91–6.33; SEE = 11.45–16.84). MDC90 values indicated no real change between T1 and T2. Conclusion: FPT is a valid and reliable test for assessing trunk musculature in adults regardless of sex and age groups.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(5)
Universidad de Granada (ES), Universidad de Cádiz (ES), University of the Americas (CL), Biomedical Research and Innovation Institute of Cadiz (ES), Universidad de León (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
5.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.