AI and Ethics: Scale Development for Measuring Ethical Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Across Sectors and Countries

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has rapidly become an integral technology across many sectors, including healthcare, finance, research, and manufacturing. AI’s ability to automate processes, analyse large datasets, and make predictive decisions offers significant opportunities for innovation, but it also raises profound ethical challenges. Ethical concerns regarding AI encompass issues of transparency, accountability, fairness, data privacy, and the need for human oversight. Given the diverse applications of AI, these ethical concerns vary not only by sector but also across different cultural and regulatory environments. Despite growing discourse on AI ethics, empirical tools for assessing ethical perceptions of AI across varied organizational contexts remain limited. From that need, this study introduces the AI and Ethics Perception Scale (AEPS), designed to measure individual and collective perceptions of AI ethics across five key dimensions: Transparency, Accountability, Privacy, Fairness, and Human Oversight. The AEPS was developed through a rigorous methodological process, beginning with a pilot study of 112 participants and validated with data from 417 participants across three culturally diverse countries: Turkey, India, and the United Kingdom. The scale was used to assess ethical perceptions in sectors such as healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. Both Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were used to validate the scale’s structure. This study reveals significant cross-cultural and cross-sectoral differences in the prioritization of ethical concerns, demonstrating the need for contextually sensitive ethical frameworks for AI governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20251301.14
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI and Ethics: Scale Development for Measuring Ethical Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Across Sectors and Countries

Ezgi Yıldırım Saatçi
3 citations
International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
7.10
article

AI and Ethics: Scale Development for Measuring Ethical Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Across Sectors and Countries

Ezgi Yıldırım Saatçi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has rapidly become an integral technology across many sectors, including healthcare, finance, research, and manufacturing. AI’s ability to automate processes, analyse large datasets, and make predictive decisions offers significant opportunities for innovation, but it also raises profound ethical challenges. Ethical concerns regarding AI encompass issues of transparency, accountability, fairness, data privacy, and the need for human oversight. Given the diverse applications of AI, these ethical concerns vary not only by sector but also across different cultural and regulatory environments. Despite growing discourse on AI ethics, empirical tools for assessing ethical perceptions of AI across varied organizational contexts remain limited. From that need, this study introduces the AI and Ethics Perception Scale (AEPS), designed to measure individual and collective perceptions of AI ethics across five key dimensions: Transparency, Accountability, Privacy, Fairness, and Human Oversight. The AEPS was developed through a rigorous methodological process, beginning with a pilot study of 112 participants and validated with data from 417 participants across three culturally diverse countries: Turkey, India, and the United Kingdom. The scale was used to assess ethical perceptions in sectors such as healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. Both Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were used to validate the scale’s structure. This study reveals significant cross-cultural and cross-sectoral differences in the prioritization of ethical concerns, demonstrating the need for contextually sensitive ethical frameworks for AI governance.

International Journal of Economic Behavior and OrganizationVol. 13(1)
BPP University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
7.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.