Looking at L1 and L2 College Students’ English Textual Differences from an SFL Perspective

Objectives The present study explores how different L1 and L2 learners’ English written texts are and how these differences are realized through lexical and grammatical choices. Methods In order to explore the differences of thematic organization represented in L1 and L2 writer students’ essays, English texts written by L1 (an English native speaker) and L2 (a Chinese native speaker) writers were selected and analyzed in terms of first sentence introduction, cohesion, usage of conjunctions, clause-combining strategies, and thematic organization. Results The two texts written by L1 and L2 writers show salient differences in how to begin the texts, cohesion and conjunction, clause-combining strategies, and thematic organization. Conclusions The analysis of grammatical choices through which different meanings are construed and different contexts are realized explicitly shows the differences between L1 and L2 writers’ texts, which leads to more insights into L2 writers’ texts and more effective instruction depending on learning needs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2025.25.4.851
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Looking at L1 and L2 College Students’ English Textual Differences from an SFL Perspective

Song-Eun Lee
Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
article

Looking at L1 and L2 College Students’ English Textual Differences from an SFL Perspective

Song-Eun Lee
article en

Abstract

Objectives The present study explores how different L1 and L2 learners’ English written texts are and how these differences are realized through lexical and grammatical choices. Methods In order to explore the differences of thematic organization represented in L1 and L2 writer students’ essays, English texts written by L1 (an English native speaker) and L2 (a Chinese native speaker) writers were selected and analyzed in terms of first sentence introduction, cohesion, usage of conjunctions, clause-combining strategies, and thematic organization. Results The two texts written by L1 and L2 writers show salient differences in how to begin the texts, cohesion and conjunction, clause-combining strategies, and thematic organization. Conclusions The analysis of grammatical choices through which different meanings are construed and different contexts are realized explicitly shows the differences between L1 and L2 writers’ texts, which leads to more insights into L2 writers’ texts and more effective instruction depending on learning needs.

Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And InstructionVol. 25(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Looking at L1 and L2 College Students’ English Textual Differences from an SFL Perspective — Song-Eun Lee · Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS