Bilingual Scribes in Magical Formularies: The Cases of <i>PGM</i> / <i>PDM</i> XII (= <i>GEMF</i> 15) and XIV (= <i>GEMF</i> 16)

This paper aims to offer a detailed palaeographical study of the stylistic peculiarities of the scribes involved in the copying of two bilingual magical formularies from the so-called Theban Magical Library. Our study concludes that both GEMF 15 and 16 were produced under the supervision of the same principal scribe-user who was probably trained in the tradition of the Egyptian temple priesthood, the only context in which the necessary knowledge of the Egyptian scripts (Demotic, Hieratic, Old Coptic) would have been available in the second century CE. This bilingual (Demotic/Greek) scribe appears to have copied the long Demotic sections of both manuscripts, and although he also wrote the short Greek sections integrated into the Demotic (either in-line or as glosses), he invited three further scribes – more highly trained in Greek – to copy the extensive Greek sections of both manuscripts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symbolae Osloenses
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00397679.2025.2454757
Primary Topic
Historical and Linguistic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bilingual Scribes in Magical Formularies: The Cases of PGM / PDM XII (= GEMF 15) and XIV (= GEMF 16)

Panagiota Sarischouli, Alberto Nodar Domínguez, Korshi Dosoo
Symbolae Osloenses
Historical and Linguistic Studies
article

Bilingual Scribes in Magical Formularies: The Cases of PGM / PDM XII (= GEMF 15) and XIV (= GEMF 16)

Panagiota Sarischouli, Alberto Nodar Domínguez, Korshi Dosoo
article en

Abstract

This paper aims to offer a detailed palaeographical study of the stylistic peculiarities of the scribes involved in the copying of two bilingual magical formularies from the so-called Theban Magical Library. Our study concludes that both GEMF 15 and 16 were produced under the supervision of the same principal scribe-user who was probably trained in the tradition of the Egyptian temple priesthood, the only context in which the necessary knowledge of the Egyptian scripts (Demotic, Hieratic, Old Coptic) would have been available in the second century CE. This bilingual (Demotic/Greek) scribe appears to have copied the long Demotic sections of both manuscripts, and although he also wrote the short Greek sections integrated into the Demotic (either in-line or as glosses), he invited three further scribes – more highly trained in Greek – to copy the extensive Greek sections of both manuscripts.

Symbolae OsloensesVol. 98(1)
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), University of Würzburg (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Historical and Linguistic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.