Prospective comparisons of three interpretation methods of fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography
Vessel-level AccuFFRct, lesion-specific AccuFFRct, and ΔAccuFFRct provided better diagnostic performance compared with CCTA, with vessel-level AccuFFRct being superior in predicting myocardial ischemia, whereas lesion-specific AccuFFRct and ΔAccuFFRct had higher specificity than vessel-level AccuFFRct.
Authors
- Hongfeng Jin
- Yumeng Hu
- Lijiang Tang
- Yitao Guo
- Wenhao Huang
- Jianping Xiang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1848-8409)
- Jianjun Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4569-0028)
- Xiaowei Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1070-4867)
- Lin Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3657-7393)
- Kun Xu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6267-2548)
- Ya‐Jun Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8761-5339)
- Jingyuan Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2268-9526)
- Changqing Du (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4992-7977)
- Xiaochang Leng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0041-7602)
- Yiming Tang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0917-2277)
- Chen Ye (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8332-6211)
- Jiangting Wang
Institutions
- Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (CN)
- Huaibei Mining (China) (CN)
- Zhejiang Hospital (CN)
- Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
- First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN)
- Zhejiang University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
- Published
- 2025-03-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-600
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.01