Is Digital History of Philosophy Possible?

The article raises the question of the possibility of “digitalization” in the field of the historical and philosophical research. We first give a brief overview of the main genres of philosophical historiography and then examine the compatibility of these genres with some instruments of natural language processing. It is argued that methods of distributional semantics (which in practice are often combined with network analysis and machine learning techniques) are among the most interesting for the historians of philosophy. However, such approaches are applicable not so much in the field of classical history of philosophy as in the field of intellectual (and cultural) history. In terms of content, the history of political thought provides more opportunities for such analysis than other domains of the history of philosophy. A forced digitalization of the field therefore carries the risk of displacing classical historical-philosophical approaches by methods of the “history of ideas” in the spirit of Lovejoy or “automatic discourse analysis” in the spirit of French structuralism. But even in these areas, the main limitations are theoretical rather than technical and concern the very possibility of operationalizing and quantifying philosophical concepts (or ideas) as something fundamentally different from words.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History of Philosophy Yearbook
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21146/0134-8655-2024-39-266-304
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Digital History of Philosophy Possible?

Olga Alieva
1 citations
History of Philosophy Yearbook
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
3.91
article

Is Digital History of Philosophy Possible?

Olga Alieva
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The article raises the question of the possibility of “digitalization” in the field of the historical and philosophical research. We first give a brief overview of the main genres of philosophical historiography and then examine the compatibility of these genres with some instruments of natural language processing. It is argued that methods of distributional semantics (which in practice are often combined with network analysis and machine learning techniques) are among the most interesting for the historians of philosophy. However, such approaches are applicable not so much in the field of classical history of philosophy as in the field of intellectual (and cultural) history. In terms of content, the history of political thought provides more opportunities for such analysis than other domains of the history of philosophy. A forced digitalization of the field therefore carries the risk of displacing classical historical-philosophical approaches by methods of the “history of ideas” in the spirit of Lovejoy or “automatic discourse analysis” in the spirit of French structuralism. But even in these areas, the main limitations are theoretical rather than technical and concern the very possibility of operationalizing and quantifying philosophical concepts (or ideas) as something fundamentally different from words.

History of Philosophy YearbookVol. 39
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is Digital History of Philosophy Possible? — Olga Alieva · History of Philosophy Yearbook (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS