BIOHAZ scientific opinion on the equivalence of an alternative heat treatment process of feathers and down

The European Commission requested EFSA to provide a scientific opinion on the equivalence between the heat treatment process of feathers and down with dry heat to a temperature of 100°C for 30 min and the treatment set up in Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011, in terms of inactivation of relevant pathogens. To be considered at least equivalent to the methods in the legislation, the alternative method should be able to reduce the concentration of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> or <i>Salmonella</i> Senftenberg by at least 5 log<sub>10</sub> and the infectious titre of <i>Anelloviridae</i> and <i>Circoviridae</i> by at least 3 log<sub>10</sub>. An extensive literature search (ELS) was conducted to identify studies in which the log<sub>10</sub> reduction or the D value of the indicators were determined after dry heating in matrices with low moisture/water activity. The ELS did not provide any study on the inactivation of <i>E. faecalis</i> by dry heating. For <i>S</i>. Senftenberg, there was no clear data demonstrating a 5 log<sub>10</sub> reduction. For <i>Anelloviridae</i> and <i>Circoviridae</i> there was limited evidence and only one study reported 1 log<sub>10</sub> reduction after 30 min at 120°C. Given the available data and sources of uncertainty, it is not possible to conclude on a 5 log<sub>10</sub> reduction of <i>E. faecalis</i> using the proposed method due to lack of evidence. Similarly, a comparable reduction of <i>S.</i> Senftenberg cannot be concluded due to conflicting evidence. For <i>Anelloviridae</i> and <i>Circoviridae,</i> it was not possible to conclude that a 3 log<sub>10</sub> reduction is achieved with the proposed method, as only one study on dry heat was retrieved, which did not demonstrate such a reduction. Therefore, based on data available to date, applying dry heat to feathers and down at 100°C for 30 min cannot be considered equivalent to the treatment specified in the Regulation, in terms of inactivation of relevant pathogens.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
EFSA Journal
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9270
Primary Topic
Insect Utilization and Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BIOHAZ scientific opinion on the equivalence of an alternative heat treatment process of feathers and down

Maarten Nauta, Valeria Bortolaia, Ana Allende, Sandra Correia et al.
EFSA Journal
Insect Utilization and Effects
article

BIOHAZ scientific opinion on the equivalence of an alternative heat treatment process of feathers and down

Maarten Nauta, Valeria Bortolaia, Ana Allende, Sandra Correia, Lapo Mughini‐Gras, Pablo Salvador Fernández Escámez, Sara Bover‐Cid, Carolina Baptista, Panagiotis Skandamis, Avelino Álvarez‐Ordóñez, Laurent Guillier, Liesbeth Jacxsens, Wietske Dohmen, John Griffin, Alessandra De Cesare, Elisabetta Suffredini, Lieve Herman, Luísa Peixe, Jakob Ottoson
article en

Abstract

The European Commission requested EFSA to provide a scientific opinion on the equivalence between the heat treatment process of feathers and down with dry heat to a temperature of 100°C for 30 min and the treatment set up in Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011, in terms of inactivation of relevant pathogens. To be considered at least equivalent to the methods in the legislation, the alternative method should be able to reduce the concentration of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> or <i>Salmonella</i> Senftenberg by at least 5 log<sub>10</sub> and the infectious titre of <i>Anelloviridae</i> and <i>Circoviridae</i> by at least 3 log<sub>10</sub>. An extensive literature search (ELS) was conducted to identify studies in which the log<sub>10</sub> reduction or the D value of the indicators were determined after dry heating in matrices with low moisture/water activity. The ELS did not provide any study on the inactivation of <i>E. faecalis</i> by dry heating. For <i>S</i>. Senftenberg, there was no clear data demonstrating a 5 log<sub>10</sub> reduction. For <i>Anelloviridae</i> and <i>Circoviridae</i> there was limited evidence and only one study reported 1 log<sub>10</sub> reduction after 30 min at 120°C. Given the available data and sources of uncertainty, it is not possible to conclude on a 5 log<sub>10</sub> reduction of <i>E. faecalis</i> using the proposed method due to lack of evidence. Similarly, a comparable reduction of <i>S.</i> Senftenberg cannot be concluded due to conflicting evidence. For <i>Anelloviridae</i> and <i>Circoviridae,</i> it was not possible to conclude that a 3 log<sub>10</sub> reduction is achieved with the proposed method, as only one study on dry heat was retrieved, which did not demonstrate such a reduction. Therefore, based on data available to date, applying dry heat to feathers and down at 100°C for 30 min cannot be considered equivalent to the treatment specified in the Regulation, in terms of inactivation of relevant pathogens.

EFSA JournalVol. 23(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Insect Utilization and Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.