BIOHAZ scientific opinion on the equivalence of an alternative heat treatment process of feathers and down
The European Commission requested EFSA to provide a scientific opinion on the equivalence between the heat treatment process of feathers and down with dry heat to a temperature of 100°C for 30 min and the treatment set up in Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011, in terms of inactivation of relevant pathogens. To be considered at least equivalent to the methods in the legislation, the alternative method should be able to reduce the concentration of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> or <i>Salmonella</i> Senftenberg by at least 5 log<sub>10</sub> and the infectious titre of <i>Anelloviridae</i> and <i>Circoviridae</i> by at least 3 log<sub>10</sub>. An extensive literature search (ELS) was conducted to identify studies in which the log<sub>10</sub> reduction or the D value of the indicators were determined after dry heating in matrices with low moisture/water activity. The ELS did not provide any study on the inactivation of <i>E. faecalis</i> by dry heating. For <i>S</i>. Senftenberg, there was no clear data demonstrating a 5 log<sub>10</sub> reduction. For <i>Anelloviridae</i> and <i>Circoviridae</i> there was limited evidence and only one study reported 1 log<sub>10</sub> reduction after 30 min at 120°C. Given the available data and sources of uncertainty, it is not possible to conclude on a 5 log<sub>10</sub> reduction of <i>E. faecalis</i> using the proposed method due to lack of evidence. Similarly, a comparable reduction of <i>S.</i> Senftenberg cannot be concluded due to conflicting evidence. For <i>Anelloviridae</i> and <i>Circoviridae,</i> it was not possible to conclude that a 3 log<sub>10</sub> reduction is achieved with the proposed method, as only one study on dry heat was retrieved, which did not demonstrate such a reduction. Therefore, based on data available to date, applying dry heat to feathers and down at 100°C for 30 min cannot be considered equivalent to the treatment specified in the Regulation, in terms of inactivation of relevant pathogens.
Authors
- Maarten Nauta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8738-4251)
- Valeria Bortolaia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6559-7344)
- Ana Allende (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5622-4332)
- Sandra Correia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2151-3916)
- Lapo Mughini‐Gras (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5420-949X)
- Pablo Salvador Fernández Escámez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4273-7268)
- Sara Bover‐Cid (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5219-671X)
- Carolina Baptista
- Panagiotis Skandamis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7878-5897)
- Avelino Álvarez‐Ordóñez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9951-4786)
- Laurent Guillier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7867-2937)
- Liesbeth Jacxsens (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2545-1441)
- Wietske Dohmen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7408-3342)
- John Griffin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7509-6770)
- Alessandra De Cesare (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5216-6617)
- Elisabetta Suffredini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7605-0539)
- Lieve Herman
- Luísa Peixe
- Jakob Ottoson
Publication Details
- Journal
- EFSA Journal
- Published
- 2025-03-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9270
- Primary Topic
- Insect Utilization and Effects
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00