A Critical Analysis of the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act 2021

The study addresses the multifaceted nature of infertility and the socio-technical response through Assisted Reproductive Technology ART, highlighting its evolution, societal implications, and legislative interventions in India. Initially perceived as a modern- day predicament, infertility’s recognition as a significant issue was catalyzed by social science, the acknowledgment of male infertility, and the stigma associated with it, especially in contexts like India. ART emerged as a transformative solution, offering various intricate procedures like in-vitro fertilization and gene tweaking to aid reproduction. However, the accessibility of these technologies was skewed, predominantly benefiting the affluent due to the high costs involved. India’s position as a hub for medical tourism, particularly for commercial surrogacy, is scrutinized, revealing a lucrative industry operating under a lax legal framework. The ensuing ethical, social, and legal complexities prompted the establishment of regulatory measures like the National Guidelines for ART Clinics and the enactment of the Assisted Reproductive Technologies Act and the Surrogacy Regulation Act in 2021. These legal instruments aim to address the exploitation of ART for commercial purposes, protect the rights of children born through these technologies, and mitigate economic disparities affecting access to ART. However, challenges persist, including the enforcement of altruistic surrogacy, exclusion of certain social groups, and the potential for black-market activities, indicating the intricate balance between technological advancement, ethical considerations, and societal norms in the realm of reproductive health.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social Science and Humanities
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53469/jssh.2025.7(02).10
Primary Topic
Diverse Topics in Contemporary Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Critical Analysis of the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act 2021

Leena K. Gautam
Journal of Social Science and Humanities
Diverse Topics in Contemporary Research
article

A Critical Analysis of the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act 2021

Leena K. Gautam
article en

Abstract

The study addresses the multifaceted nature of infertility and the socio-technical response through Assisted Reproductive Technology ART, highlighting its evolution, societal implications, and legislative interventions in India. Initially perceived as a modern- day predicament, infertility’s recognition as a significant issue was catalyzed by social science, the acknowledgment of male infertility, and the stigma associated with it, especially in contexts like India. ART emerged as a transformative solution, offering various intricate procedures like in-vitro fertilization and gene tweaking to aid reproduction. However, the accessibility of these technologies was skewed, predominantly benefiting the affluent due to the high costs involved. India’s position as a hub for medical tourism, particularly for commercial surrogacy, is scrutinized, revealing a lucrative industry operating under a lax legal framework. The ensuing ethical, social, and legal complexities prompted the establishment of regulatory measures like the National Guidelines for ART Clinics and the enactment of the Assisted Reproductive Technologies Act and the Surrogacy Regulation Act in 2021. These legal instruments aim to address the exploitation of ART for commercial purposes, protect the rights of children born through these technologies, and mitigate economic disparities affecting access to ART. However, challenges persist, including the enforcement of altruistic surrogacy, exclusion of certain social groups, and the potential for black-market activities, indicating the intricate balance between technological advancement, ethical considerations, and societal norms in the realm of reproductive health.

Journal of Social Science and HumanitiesVol. 7(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Diverse Topics in Contemporary Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.