Bioequivalence Study of Two Oral Methocarbamol Formulations in Healthy Subjects Under Fasting Conditions: A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Clinical Trial

<b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to assess the bioequivalence of two oral methocarbamol formulations, as follows: the test (T) methocarbamol 1500 mg tablets and the reference (R) Robaxin<sup>®</sup> 500 mg tablets (3 tablets, total dose: 1500 mg) under fasting conditions, and compare their pharmacokinetic performance. <b>Methods:</b> This was a single-center, phase I, randomized, open-label (blinded for analytical determination), two-sequence, two-period, crossover, bioequivalence study. A total of 32 healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to receive the T-R or R-T administration sequence. Each volunteer received a single dose of each methocarbamol formulation (T or R) separated by a washout period of 7 days. To evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile, blood samples were collected at nineteen time points after dosing. <b>Results:</b> The arithmetic mean C<sub>max</sub> was 31.72 µg/mL for R and 32.39 µg/mL for T, and the arithmetic mean AUC<sub>0-t</sub> was 90.25 h × µg/mL and 89.72 h × µg/mL, respectively. All adverse events reported were mild for both formulations. The 90% confidence intervals for the corresponding logarithmically transformed geometric mean ratios of C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>0-t</sub> fell within the acceptance interval of 80.00-125.00%, as their values were 91.67-112.47% for ln(C<sub>max</sub>) and 92.34-103.47% for ln(AUC<sub>0-t</sub>). <b>Conclusion:</b> Therefore, one tablet of methocarbamol 1500 mg was found to be bioequivalent to the Robaxin<sup>®</sup> 500 mg tablets (3 tablets), with comparable tolerability and safety profiles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceuticals
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18030354
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bioequivalence Study of Two Oral Methocarbamol Formulations in Healthy Subjects Under Fasting Conditions: A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Clinical Trial

Antonio Portolés, Carla Pérez-Ingidua, Ana Ascaso, Inmaculada Gilaberte et al.
1 citations
Pharmaceuticals
Pharmaceutical studies and practices
3.49
article

Bioequivalence Study of Two Oral Methocarbamol Formulations in Healthy Subjects Under Fasting Conditions: A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Clinical Trial

Antonio Portolés, Carla Pérez-Ingidua, Ana Ascaso, Inmaculada Gilaberte, Leonor Laredo, Iván Alejandro Díaz-Rengifo, Emilio Vargas, Paola Camargo-Mamani, Teresa Iglesias-Hernangómez, Luis Caballero, María Rosario Salas-Butrón, Mónica Díez-Hochleitner
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to assess the bioequivalence of two oral methocarbamol formulations, as follows: the test (T) methocarbamol 1500 mg tablets and the reference (R) Robaxin<sup>®</sup> 500 mg tablets (3 tablets, total dose: 1500 mg) under fasting conditions, and compare their pharmacokinetic performance. <b>Methods:</b> This was a single-center, phase I, randomized, open-label (blinded for analytical determination), two-sequence, two-period, crossover, bioequivalence study. A total of 32 healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to receive the T-R or R-T administration sequence. Each volunteer received a single dose of each methocarbamol formulation (T or R) separated by a washout period of 7 days. To evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile, blood samples were collected at nineteen time points after dosing. <b>Results:</b> The arithmetic mean C<sub>max</sub> was 31.72 µg/mL for R and 32.39 µg/mL for T, and the arithmetic mean AUC<sub>0-t</sub> was 90.25 h × µg/mL and 89.72 h × µg/mL, respectively. All adverse events reported were mild for both formulations. The 90% confidence intervals for the corresponding logarithmically transformed geometric mean ratios of C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>0-t</sub> fell within the acceptance interval of 80.00-125.00%, as their values were 91.67-112.47% for ln(C<sub>max</sub>) and 92.34-103.47% for ln(AUC<sub>0-t</sub>). <b>Conclusion:</b> Therefore, one tablet of methocarbamol 1500 mg was found to be bioequivalent to the Robaxin<sup>®</sup> 500 mg tablets (3 tablets), with comparable tolerability and safety profiles.

PharmaceuticalsVol. 18(3)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES), Faes Farma (Spain) (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Pharmaceutical studies and practices
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.