Comparative Analysis of Methods for Assessing On-Target Gene Editing Efficiencies

Genome editing based on CRISPR-derived technologies has become a cornerstone in both fundamental research and clinical applications. Accurately measuring editing efficiency is crucial for developing and applying genome editing strategies. This study offers a detailed comparison of widely used techniques for evaluating on-target gene editing efficiency, including T7 Endonuclease I (T7EI), Tracking of Indels by Decomposition (TIDE), Inference of CRISPR Edits (ICE), droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), and live-cell assays involving engineered fluorescent reporter cells. Through a comparative analysis, this study highlights the unique strengths and limitations of each method, aiding researchers in choosing the most appropriate method for their specific needs, ensuring more tailored monitoring of genome editing outcomes in a precise and reliable manner.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Methods and Protocols
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/mps8020023
Citations
2
Primary Topic
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Methods for Assessing On-Target Gene Editing Efficiencies

Joost P. G. Sluijter, Zhiyong Lei, Raymond M. Schiffelers, Manuel A.F.V. Gonçalves et al.
2 citations
Methods and Protocols
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
1.61
article

Comparative Analysis of Methods for Assessing On-Target Gene Editing Efficiencies

Joost P. G. Sluijter, Zhiyong Lei, Raymond M. Schiffelers, Manuel A.F.V. Gonçalves, Bing Yao, Qiangbing Yang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Genome editing based on CRISPR-derived technologies has become a cornerstone in both fundamental research and clinical applications. Accurately measuring editing efficiency is crucial for developing and applying genome editing strategies. This study offers a detailed comparison of widely used techniques for evaluating on-target gene editing efficiency, including T7 Endonuclease I (T7EI), Tracking of Indels by Decomposition (TIDE), Inference of CRISPR Edits (ICE), droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), and live-cell assays involving engineered fluorescent reporter cells. Through a comparative analysis, this study highlights the unique strengths and limitations of each method, aiding researchers in choosing the most appropriate method for their specific needs, ensuring more tailored monitoring of genome editing outcomes in a precise and reliable manner.

Methods and ProtocolsVol. 8(2)
Leiden University (NL), Utrecht University (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
China Scholarship Council
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
1.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of Methods for Assessing On-Target Gene Editing Efficiencies — Joost P. G. Sluijter, Zhiyong Lei, et al. · Methods and Protocols (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS