Religiosity, Sexual Double Standard, and Intimate Partner Coercive Victimization in Dating Relationships: An Explanatory Model and Psychometric Evidence

The literature identifies coercive violence in dating relationships as one of the most prevalent forms of violence and a precursor to more severe types of abuse. While the relationship between the sexual double standard (SDS) and religion with intimate partner violence has been studied, there is a lack of research exploring the direct and indirect influence of religiosity through the promotion of the SDS. This gap is particularly evident when considering measurement invariance by gender, despite these variables being shaped by gender norms. Using a sample of Chilean university students, this study examined the structure and factorial invariance by gender of the Sexual Double Standard Scale (DSS) (<i>N</i> = 909) and the Relationship Control Factor Subscale (RCFS) (<i>N</i> = 855). Additionally, the study analyzed, for each gender, the impact of religiosity on experiences of coercive victimization within relationships, considering the mediating role of the SDS (<i>N</i> = 781). Both instruments revealed different structures by gender, leading to the development of independent models for men (<i>N</i> = 278) and women (<i>N</i> = 500). Religiosity emerged as a risk factor for victimization in both study groups. However, it also exhibited a protective effect specifically for women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2025-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030294
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Religiosity, Sexual Double Standard, and Intimate Partner Coercive Victimization in Dating Relationships: An Explanatory Model and Psychometric Evidence

Alhena L. Alfaro-Urquiola, Javier Herrero Díez, Beatriz Pérez, Francisco Javier Rodríguez‐Díaz
Behavioral Sciences
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

Religiosity, Sexual Double Standard, and Intimate Partner Coercive Victimization in Dating Relationships: An Explanatory Model and Psychometric Evidence

Alhena L. Alfaro-Urquiola, Javier Herrero Díez, Beatriz Pérez, Francisco Javier Rodríguez‐Díaz
article en

Abstract

The literature identifies coercive violence in dating relationships as one of the most prevalent forms of violence and a precursor to more severe types of abuse. While the relationship between the sexual double standard (SDS) and religion with intimate partner violence has been studied, there is a lack of research exploring the direct and indirect influence of religiosity through the promotion of the SDS. This gap is particularly evident when considering measurement invariance by gender, despite these variables being shaped by gender norms. Using a sample of Chilean university students, this study examined the structure and factorial invariance by gender of the Sexual Double Standard Scale (DSS) (<i>N</i> = 909) and the Relationship Control Factor Subscale (RCFS) (<i>N</i> = 855). Additionally, the study analyzed, for each gender, the impact of religiosity on experiences of coercive victimization within relationships, considering the mediating role of the SDS (<i>N</i> = 781). Both instruments revealed different structures by gender, leading to the development of independent models for men (<i>N</i> = 278) and women (<i>N</i> = 500). Religiosity emerged as a risk factor for victimization in both study groups. However, it also exhibited a protective effect specifically for women.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 15(3)
Universidad de La Frontera (CL), Universidad de Oviedo (ES)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Religiosity, Sexual Double Standard, and Intimate Partner Coercive Victimization in Dating Relationships: An Explanatory Model and Psychometric Evidence — Alhena L. Alfaro-Urquiola, Javier Herrero Díez, et al. · Behavioral Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS