Detailed Examples of Figure Preparation in the Two Most Common Graph Layouts

Graphs are an excellent tool with applications in various branches of engineering. Graph layouts have emerged as a cornerstone in the visual representation and analysis of complex systems. They are indispensable in reducing complexity, optimizing designs, improving communication, and enhancing problem-solving capabilities. They transform abstract concepts and data into visual formats that are easier to interpret, analyze, and apply in real-world engineering challenges. Therefore, many graph layouts are designed for various purposes. It is not easy to choose the most appropriate one. There are a number of surveys on this subject, but they are descriptive ones. In this paper, we focus on the two most versatile—and therefore most widely used—layouts, namely Fruchterman–Reingold and ForceAtlas2, and show their possibilities in a visual way. We compare how the drawings appear while using various settings of the available options. This helps to choose an appropriate set of settings in practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15052645
Primary Topic
Data Visualization and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detailed Examples of Figure Preparation in the Two Most Common Graph Layouts

Izolda Gorgol, Hubert Salwa
Applied Sciences
Data Visualization and Analytics
article

Detailed Examples of Figure Preparation in the Two Most Common Graph Layouts

Izolda Gorgol, Hubert Salwa
article en

Abstract

Graphs are an excellent tool with applications in various branches of engineering. Graph layouts have emerged as a cornerstone in the visual representation and analysis of complex systems. They are indispensable in reducing complexity, optimizing designs, improving communication, and enhancing problem-solving capabilities. They transform abstract concepts and data into visual formats that are easier to interpret, analyze, and apply in real-world engineering challenges. Therefore, many graph layouts are designed for various purposes. It is not easy to choose the most appropriate one. There are a number of surveys on this subject, but they are descriptive ones. In this paper, we focus on the two most versatile—and therefore most widely used—layouts, namely Fruchterman–Reingold and ForceAtlas2, and show their possibilities in a visual way. We compare how the drawings appear while using various settings of the available options. This helps to choose an appropriate set of settings in practice.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(5)
Lublin University of Technology (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Data Visualization and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.