Opportunities and Limitations for Adolescent Participation in Research – Lessons Learned from the End Child Marriage Flagship Evaluation in Ethiopia

Despite the increased importance of downward accountability and the inclusion of program participants in all stages of program cycle management, the application of participatory research methods in program evaluations is still limited. This paper discusses the trade-offs between non-participatory and participatory evaluation approaches in international development cooperation and explores how program evaluations can meaningfully engage program participants while also adhering to established standards of academic rigor and pragmatic feasibility. The paper draws lessons and shares learnings from the End Child Marriage Flagship Evaluation, which integrated ‘conventional’ evaluation approaches and participatory research to meaningfully include adolescent program participants. Finally, the paper compares experiences of the evaluation to other participatory program evaluations and links lessons learned to a broader discussion about prerequisites and trade-offs for applying participatory evaluation approaches and calls to re-imagine conventional evaluation standards to enable program participants to engage in a meaningful way.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal
Published
2025-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1201.18197
Primary Topic
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Opportunities and Limitations for Adolescent Participation in Research – Lessons Learned from the End Child Marriage Flagship Evaluation in Ethiopia

H Shafeeq Ahmed, Johanna Kern, Valentina Prosperi
Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
article

Opportunities and Limitations for Adolescent Participation in Research – Lessons Learned from the End Child Marriage Flagship Evaluation in Ethiopia

H Shafeeq Ahmed, Johanna Kern, Valentina Prosperi
article en

Abstract

Despite the increased importance of downward accountability and the inclusion of program participants in all stages of program cycle management, the application of participatory research methods in program evaluations is still limited. This paper discusses the trade-offs between non-participatory and participatory evaluation approaches in international development cooperation and explores how program evaluations can meaningfully engage program participants while also adhering to established standards of academic rigor and pragmatic feasibility. The paper draws lessons and shares learnings from the End Child Marriage Flagship Evaluation, which integrated ‘conventional’ evaluation approaches and participatory research to meaningfully include adolescent program participants. Finally, the paper compares experiences of the evaluation to other participatory program evaluations and links lessons learned to a broader discussion about prerequisites and trade-offs for applying participatory evaluation approaches and calls to re-imagine conventional evaluation standards to enable program participants to engage in a meaningful way.

Advances in Social Sciences Research JournalVol. 12(01)
United Nations Children's Fund (US), Center for Evaluation and Development (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.