How Foreign and Domestic Ownership Influenced Risk-Taking in GCC Banks

This study investigates the relationship between ownership structure (foreign and domestic) and bank risk-taking over the period 2014–2022. The analysis includes 66 banks operating in the GCC, divided into 44 domestically owned, and 22 foreign-owned banks. The research examines the relationship across two distinct periods: the pre-pandemic and the COVID-19 pandemic era, using the two-stage least squares (2SLS) method, and panel data techniques for robust analysis. The findings reveal that, in both periods, foreign-owned banks exhibited lower credit risk, greater cost efficiency, and less risk-taking compared to domestic counterparts. Domestic banks, while maintaining profitability, relied heavily on capital absorbency, which resulted in elevated credit risk and operational inefficiencies. These inefficiencies, observed among domestic banks, stem from inadequate monitoring of borrowers’ information and the occurrence of moral hazard. Foreign banks played a crucial role in supporting banking sector stability, as their presence enhanced the GDP growth. The results are in line with the “global advantage hypothesis”.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Financial Studies
Published
2025-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs13010033
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Foreign and Domestic Ownership Influenced Risk-Taking in GCC Banks

Sarah Lindop, Ahmed Mohammed, Abdullah Aldousari
3 citations
International Journal of Financial Studies
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
11.73
article

How Foreign and Domestic Ownership Influenced Risk-Taking in GCC Banks

Sarah Lindop, Ahmed Mohammed, Abdullah Aldousari
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between ownership structure (foreign and domestic) and bank risk-taking over the period 2014–2022. The analysis includes 66 banks operating in the GCC, divided into 44 domestically owned, and 22 foreign-owned banks. The research examines the relationship across two distinct periods: the pre-pandemic and the COVID-19 pandemic era, using the two-stage least squares (2SLS) method, and panel data techniques for robust analysis. The findings reveal that, in both periods, foreign-owned banks exhibited lower credit risk, greater cost efficiency, and less risk-taking compared to domestic counterparts. Domestic banks, while maintaining profitability, relied heavily on capital absorbency, which resulted in elevated credit risk and operational inefficiencies. These inefficiencies, observed among domestic banks, stem from inadequate monitoring of borrowers’ information and the occurrence of moral hazard. Foreign banks played a crucial role in supporting banking sector stability, as their presence enhanced the GDP growth. The results are in line with the “global advantage hypothesis”.

International Journal of Financial StudiesVol. 13(1)
Aberystwyth University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
11.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How Foreign and Domestic Ownership Influenced Risk-Taking in GCC Banks — Sarah Lindop, Ahmed Mohammed, et al. · International Journal of Financial Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS