Double-Cropping Systems Based on Maize, Sorghum, and Alfalfa: Impact on Nutritive Value and Silage Fermentation Quality

The accelerating development of the forage industry and the land resources finiteness require the high-efficient forage cropping strategies. To investigate the nutritive quality of the mixed forage crop cultivation, a three-round field test of two double-cropping systems (DCSs) based on maize (Dongdan 60 and Dongdan 1331) and sorghum (1230 and cfsh30) as the summer forage crop and alfalfa as the preceding winter forage crop were compared. This study investigated the impact on nutritive value and silage fermentation quality. The M-A system (alfalfa following a preceding crop of maize) outperformed the S-A system (alfalfa following a preceding crop of sorghum) in silage fermentation quality (by 2.81 of M and 2.22 of A), crude ash (by 0.94% of M and 3.5% of A), phosphorus content (by 0.1% of M and 0.17% of A), and potassium content (by 0.47% of M and 0.41% of A). Within the M-A, the maize Dongdan 60 (M1)–alfalfa WL525 (A) combination under the suitable sowing condition (D1) achieved the best nutritive quality exhibiting, not only the highest Flieg score (88.17 of M1 and 92.5 of A) but also the highest crude ash content (6.71% of M1 and 11.82% of A), phosphorus content (0.38% of M1 and 0.48% of A), and potassium content (1.68% of M1 and 1.55% of A). Delayed sowing reduced nutrient accumulation and altered fermentation profiles, highlighting the importance of timely sowing. The study revealed that the double-cropping rotation of maize and alfalfa is a promising strategy to optimize nutritive quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15030630
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Double-Cropping Systems Based on Maize, Sorghum, and Alfalfa: Impact on Nutritive Value and Silage Fermentation Quality

Zhongya Ji, Guanglong Zhu, Guisheng Zhou, Xiaoshan Wang et al.
4 citations
Agronomy
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
7.61
article

Double-Cropping Systems Based on Maize, Sorghum, and Alfalfa: Impact on Nutritive Value and Silage Fermentation Quality

Zhongya Ji, Guanglong Zhu, Guisheng Zhou, Xiaoshan Wang, Lijuan Jiang, Yu Shi
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The accelerating development of the forage industry and the land resources finiteness require the high-efficient forage cropping strategies. To investigate the nutritive quality of the mixed forage crop cultivation, a three-round field test of two double-cropping systems (DCSs) based on maize (Dongdan 60 and Dongdan 1331) and sorghum (1230 and cfsh30) as the summer forage crop and alfalfa as the preceding winter forage crop were compared. This study investigated the impact on nutritive value and silage fermentation quality. The M-A system (alfalfa following a preceding crop of maize) outperformed the S-A system (alfalfa following a preceding crop of sorghum) in silage fermentation quality (by 2.81 of M and 2.22 of A), crude ash (by 0.94% of M and 3.5% of A), phosphorus content (by 0.1% of M and 0.17% of A), and potassium content (by 0.47% of M and 0.41% of A). Within the M-A, the maize Dongdan 60 (M1)–alfalfa WL525 (A) combination under the suitable sowing condition (D1) achieved the best nutritive quality exhibiting, not only the highest Flieg score (88.17 of M1 and 92.5 of A) but also the highest crude ash content (6.71% of M1 and 11.82% of A), phosphorus content (0.38% of M1 and 0.48% of A), and potassium content (1.68% of M1 and 1.55% of A). Delayed sowing reduced nutrient accumulation and altered fermentation profiles, highlighting the importance of timely sowing. The study revealed that the double-cropping rotation of maize and alfalfa is a promising strategy to optimize nutritive quality.

AgronomyVol. 15(3)
Yangzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
7.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.