Prediction of Root-Zone Soil Moisture and Evapotranspiration in Cropland Using HYDRUS-1D Model with Different Soil Hydrodynamic Parameter Schemes

This study provides a comprehensive assessment of the HYDRUS-1D model for predicting root-zone soil moisture (RZSM) and evapotranspiration (ET). It evaluates different soil hydrodynamic parameter (SHP) schemes—soil type-based, soil texture-based, and inverse solution—under varying cropping systems (Zea mays–Glycine max rotation and continuous Zea mays) and moisture conditions (irrigated and rainfed), aiming to understand water transport across different cultivation patterns. Using field measurements from 2002, the SHPs were optimized for each scheme and applied to predict RZSM and ET from 2003 to 2007. The inverse solution scheme produced nearly unbiased RZSM predictions with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.011 m3m⁻3, compared to RMSEs of 0.036 m3m⁻3 and 0.042 m3m⁻3 for the soil type-based and soil texture-based schemes, respectively. For ET predictions, comparable accuracy was achieved, with RMSEs of 66.4 Wm⁻2, 69.5 Wm⁻2, and 68.2 Wm⁻2 across the three schemes. RZSM prediction accuracy declined over time in the continuous Zea mays field for all schemes, while systematic errors predominated in the Zea mays–Glycine max rotation field. ET accuracy trends mirrored RZSM in irrigated systems but diverged in rainfed croplands due to the decoupling of ET and RZSM under arid conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2025-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w17050730
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of Root-Zone Soil Moisture and Evapotranspiration in Cropland Using HYDRUS-1D Model with Different Soil Hydrodynamic Parameter Schemes

Qian‐Yu Liao, Jélila Labed, Zhao‐Liang Li, Pei Leng
2 citations
Water
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
2.21
article

Prediction of Root-Zone Soil Moisture and Evapotranspiration in Cropland Using HYDRUS-1D Model with Different Soil Hydrodynamic Parameter Schemes

Qian‐Yu Liao, Jélila Labed, Zhao‐Liang Li, Pei Leng
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive assessment of the HYDRUS-1D model for predicting root-zone soil moisture (RZSM) and evapotranspiration (ET). It evaluates different soil hydrodynamic parameter (SHP) schemes—soil type-based, soil texture-based, and inverse solution—under varying cropping systems (Zea mays–Glycine max rotation and continuous Zea mays) and moisture conditions (irrigated and rainfed), aiming to understand water transport across different cultivation patterns. Using field measurements from 2002, the SHPs were optimized for each scheme and applied to predict RZSM and ET from 2003 to 2007. The inverse solution scheme produced nearly unbiased RZSM predictions with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.011 m3m⁻3, compared to RMSEs of 0.036 m3m⁻3 and 0.042 m3m⁻3 for the soil type-based and soil texture-based schemes, respectively. For ET predictions, comparable accuracy was achieved, with RMSEs of 66.4 Wm⁻2, 69.5 Wm⁻2, and 68.2 Wm⁻2 across the three schemes. RZSM prediction accuracy declined over time in the continuous Zea mays field for all schemes, while systematic errors predominated in the Zea mays–Glycine max rotation field. ET accuracy trends mirrored RZSM in irrigated systems but diverged in rainfed croplands due to the decoupling of ET and RZSM under arid conditions.

WaterVol. 17(5)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning (CN), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Université de Strasbourg (FR)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.