Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Education: Academics Beliefs, Concerns and Pathways for Integration

Although globally there are mixed perceptions regarding the academic integrity of chatbots, existing research has mainly focused on developed nations, neglecting the unique perspectives of academics in developing countries, with different contextual, environmental, and technological settings. This study presents lecturers’ perceptions of using Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbots in education. Guided by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2), this research collected quantitative and qualitative data from 140 lecturers and three administrators from a STEM-based Zimbabwean university. The research confirmed that performance expectancy (belief in improved efficiency and personalised learning) and perceived value and social influence drive adoption. Contrary to previous studies, there was no significant link between effort expectancy (reduced workload) and chatbot use. Demographics like gender, age, and qualifications did not impact chatbot use. Academics were cautiously optimistic, recognising benefits like personalised learning and routine task management but concerned about ease of use, technical expertise, and ethical considerations. To effectively integrate AI chatbots into higher education processes, there is a need for funding, technical support, training, strengthening IT infrastructure and establishing frameworks for responsible use. Emphasising efficiency, personalisation, and robust support will help overcome barriers and maximise AI chatbots’ potential in education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indonesian Journal of Information Systems
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24002/ijis.v7i2.10805
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Education: Academics Beliefs, Concerns and Pathways for Integration

Kudakwashe Maguraushe, Belinda Ndlovu, Sibusisiwe Dube, Sharmaine Ndlovu
2 citations
Indonesian Journal of Information Systems
Online Learning and Analytics
3.39
article

Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Education: Academics Beliefs, Concerns and Pathways for Integration

Kudakwashe Maguraushe, Belinda Ndlovu, Sibusisiwe Dube, Sharmaine Ndlovu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Although globally there are mixed perceptions regarding the academic integrity of chatbots, existing research has mainly focused on developed nations, neglecting the unique perspectives of academics in developing countries, with different contextual, environmental, and technological settings. This study presents lecturers’ perceptions of using Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbots in education. Guided by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2), this research collected quantitative and qualitative data from 140 lecturers and three administrators from a STEM-based Zimbabwean university. The research confirmed that performance expectancy (belief in improved efficiency and personalised learning) and perceived value and social influence drive adoption. Contrary to previous studies, there was no significant link between effort expectancy (reduced workload) and chatbot use. Demographics like gender, age, and qualifications did not impact chatbot use. Academics were cautiously optimistic, recognising benefits like personalised learning and routine task management but concerned about ease of use, technical expertise, and ethical considerations. To effectively integrate AI chatbots into higher education processes, there is a need for funding, technical support, training, strengthening IT infrastructure and establishing frameworks for responsible use. Emphasising efficiency, personalisation, and robust support will help overcome barriers and maximise AI chatbots’ potential in education.

Indonesian Journal of Information SystemsVol. 7(2)
Mangosuthu University of Technology (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Online Learning and Analytics
3.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.