Ventilator Liberation Practices in Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care

<b>Background:</b> Mechanical ventilation is common in critically ill children with cardiac disease, but literature focused on ventilator liberation practices for this unique pediatric subpopulation is limited. We aimed to describe current ventilator liberation practices in critically ill children with cardiac disease. <b>Methods:</b> Through the Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium, an electronic survey was distributed to pediatric ICU attending physicians caring for patients with cardiac disease evaluating institutional protocols and individual practices around ventilator liberation including criteria for extubation readiness testing (ERT), ERT components, spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) method and duration, timing of extubation, and postextubation respiratory support. <b>Results:</b> We received 133 responses representing 47 hospitals. ERT eligibility screening and SBT protocols were reported at 22 (47%) and 26 (55%) of the 47 institutions, respectively. Most respondents used SBTs in their assessment of extubation readiness (95%) and pressure support augmentation to CPAP for SBT (92%). Most respondents reported a maximum dose threshold for epinephrine (81%), above which they would not extubate. Some indices used for determination of extubation readiness were used by nearly all respondents: pulse oximetry (92%), serum lactate (86%), and arterial pH (85%); but some respondents also report using mixed venous saturation (68%), ventricular function (62%), near-infrared spectroscopy (62%), and systemic atrioventricular valve regurgitation (53%). Reported use of noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) after extubation was common, up to 90% in selected subgroups. There was wide variation in the type of NRS used in all populations. <b>Conclusions:</b> ERT eligibility screening and SBT protocols were reported in only half of the institutions surveyed, and notable variation exists between parameters surrounding extubation readiness assessment and postextubation respiratory support. These data suggest opportunities to increase protocol development to align with established clinical practice guidelines around ERT and conduct multi-center quality improvement to identify best practices for ventilator liberation in this patient population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Respiratory Care
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.12239
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ventilator Liberation Practices in Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care

David K. Werho, Samer Abu‐Sultaneh, Christopher W. Mastropietro, Jeremy M. Loberger et al.
4 citations
Respiratory Care
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
6.07
article

Ventilator Liberation Practices in Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care

David K. Werho, Samer Abu‐Sultaneh, Christopher W. Mastropietro, Jeremy M. Loberger, Michael Gaies, Hayden Zaccagni, Deanna Todd Tzanetos, Amy Romer, R Klein
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Mechanical ventilation is common in critically ill children with cardiac disease, but literature focused on ventilator liberation practices for this unique pediatric subpopulation is limited. We aimed to describe current ventilator liberation practices in critically ill children with cardiac disease. <b>Methods:</b> Through the Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium, an electronic survey was distributed to pediatric ICU attending physicians caring for patients with cardiac disease evaluating institutional protocols and individual practices around ventilator liberation including criteria for extubation readiness testing (ERT), ERT components, spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) method and duration, timing of extubation, and postextubation respiratory support. <b>Results:</b> We received 133 responses representing 47 hospitals. ERT eligibility screening and SBT protocols were reported at 22 (47%) and 26 (55%) of the 47 institutions, respectively. Most respondents used SBTs in their assessment of extubation readiness (95%) and pressure support augmentation to CPAP for SBT (92%). Most respondents reported a maximum dose threshold for epinephrine (81%), above which they would not extubate. Some indices used for determination of extubation readiness were used by nearly all respondents: pulse oximetry (92%), serum lactate (86%), and arterial pH (85%); but some respondents also report using mixed venous saturation (68%), ventricular function (62%), near-infrared spectroscopy (62%), and systemic atrioventricular valve regurgitation (53%). Reported use of noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) after extubation was common, up to 90% in selected subgroups. There was wide variation in the type of NRS used in all populations. <b>Conclusions:</b> ERT eligibility screening and SBT protocols were reported in only half of the institutions surveyed, and notable variation exists between parameters surrounding extubation readiness assessment and postextubation respiratory support. These data suggest opportunities to increase protocol development to align with established clinical practice guidelines around ERT and conduct multi-center quality improvement to identify best practices for ventilator liberation in this patient population.

Respiratory CareVol. 70(3)
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US), Riley Hospital for Children (US), Children's of Alabama (US), Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego (US), Children's Hospital Colorado (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Kosair Children's Hospital (US), Norton Hospital (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
6.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.