EVALUATION AND PRIORITIZATION OF MUTUAL FUNDS USING INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS

Investment has become increasingly important for individuals in today’s economic landscape, particularly regarding the growth of the capital market. A primary concern for investors is selecting the best investment options. When faced with complex decisions, such as choosing a mutual fund, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods can be used to prioritize options and make optimal choices. This study focuses on the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analysis Hierarchy Process (IFAHP) technique. Given the significance of investment in the current economy, this study aims to apply and describe the IFAHP technique for ranking mutual funds listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. A total of 20 mutual funds were selected based on their size and superior performance compared to other mutual funds, utilizing statistics published by the Financial Information Processing Center of Iran. The mutual funds were evaluated and prioritized using the IFAHP technique, resulting in the following cumulative weights and final weights: Moshtarek Agah (0.6360, ranked 1), Sepehr Aval Bazar (0.6248, ranked 2), and Ofoghe Melat (0.6234, ranked 3) holding the highest priorities. Conversely, the mutual funds Firozeh Movafaghiat (0.4550, ranked 20), Toseh Atlas Mofid (0.4584, ranked 19), and Moshtarek Kargozari Bank Meli Iran (0.4803, ranked 18) have the lowest priorities for investment. Therefore, according to these results and their desired criteria, investors can identify the most suitable options for their investments to maximize their profits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process
Published
2025-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v16i3.1237
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EVALUATION AND PRIORITIZATION OF MUTUAL FUNDS USING INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS

Seyed Mojtaba Mirlohi, Reza Sheikh, Soheila Senfi
1 citations
International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
2.11
article

EVALUATION AND PRIORITIZATION OF MUTUAL FUNDS USING INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS

Seyed Mojtaba Mirlohi, Reza Sheikh, Soheila Senfi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Investment has become increasingly important for individuals in today’s economic landscape, particularly regarding the growth of the capital market. A primary concern for investors is selecting the best investment options. When faced with complex decisions, such as choosing a mutual fund, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods can be used to prioritize options and make optimal choices. This study focuses on the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analysis Hierarchy Process (IFAHP) technique. Given the significance of investment in the current economy, this study aims to apply and describe the IFAHP technique for ranking mutual funds listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. A total of 20 mutual funds were selected based on their size and superior performance compared to other mutual funds, utilizing statistics published by the Financial Information Processing Center of Iran. The mutual funds were evaluated and prioritized using the IFAHP technique, resulting in the following cumulative weights and final weights: Moshtarek Agah (0.6360, ranked 1), Sepehr Aval Bazar (0.6248, ranked 2), and Ofoghe Melat (0.6234, ranked 3) holding the highest priorities. Conversely, the mutual funds Firozeh Movafaghiat (0.4550, ranked 20), Toseh Atlas Mofid (0.4584, ranked 19), and Moshtarek Kargozari Bank Meli Iran (0.4803, ranked 18) have the lowest priorities for investment. Therefore, according to these results and their desired criteria, investors can identify the most suitable options for their investments to maximize their profits.

International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy ProcessVol. 16(3)
University of Shahrood (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.