Performance Trade-offs in GNN Inference: An Early Study on Hardware and Sampling Configurations

Inferencing over Graph Neural Network (GNN) has recently gained traction in applications like recommender systems and fraud detection. However, building a high through-put, low latency GNN serving system for large graphs in real-world applications is challenging due to the irregular memory access patterns and high host−device data transfer times. In this poster, we study the effects of various hardware and sampling configurations on the latency and performance of GNN serving, which will help build scalable GNN serving systems. Our results show that sampling on CPU and inference on GPU, popular for training, does not do well for inferencing. Smaller fan-outs give reasonable accuracies but suffer from high variability while GPU-based sampling fails with high fan-outs, making Unified Virtual Addressing (UVA) based sampling a preferred alternative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/hipcw63042.2024.00064
Primary Topic
Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Trade-offs in GNN Inference: An Early Study on Hardware and Sampling Configurations

Yogesh Simmhan, Pranjal Naman
Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
article

Performance Trade-offs in GNN Inference: An Early Study on Hardware and Sampling Configurations

Yogesh Simmhan, Pranjal Naman
article en

Abstract

Inferencing over Graph Neural Network (GNN) has recently gained traction in applications like recommender systems and fraud detection. However, building a high through-put, low latency GNN serving system for large graphs in real-world applications is challenging due to the irregular memory access patterns and high host−device data transfer times. In this poster, we study the effects of various hardware and sampling configurations on the latency and performance of GNN serving, which will help build scalable GNN serving systems. Our results show that sampling on CPU and inference on GPU, popular for training, does not do well for inferencing. Smaller fan-outs give reasonable accuracies but suffer from high variability while GPU-based sampling fails with high fan-outs, making Unified Virtual Addressing (UVA) based sampling a preferred alternative.

Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.