Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Pulse Jammer Detection

This work compares various machine learning algorithms for predicting the presence of a random on/off jammer in wireless communication systems. We analyze four machine learning classification algorithms, Decision Trees, Support Vector Machines, K-nearest neighbors, and Random Forest. The study applies data pre-processing techniques to improve detection performance and assesses the algorithms using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Among the tested methods, Random Forest and Decision Trees achieved the highest performance with an accuracy of 97.5%, precision of 1.00, recall of 0.95, and an $F 1$ score of 0.97. SVM demonstrated strong precision at 1.00 but slightly lower accuracy at $\mathbf{9 2. 5 \%}$, while KNN exhibited the lowest accuracy at 85%. These results highlight the effectiveness of Random Forest and Decision Trees for robust and efficient jammer detection. The findings have significant implications for enhancing the resilience of wireless communication systems against jamming attacks. In particular, we show the use-case of our analytical work in the classification-based application of wireless communication systems, specifically jammer detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ants63515.2024.10898361
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Earthquake Detection and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Pulse Jammer Detection

Manav R. Bhatnagar, Srishti Srivastava, Prerna Chaudhary
1 citations
Earthquake Detection and Analysis
0.53
article

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Pulse Jammer Detection

Manav R. Bhatnagar, Srishti Srivastava, Prerna Chaudhary
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This work compares various machine learning algorithms for predicting the presence of a random on/off jammer in wireless communication systems. We analyze four machine learning classification algorithms, Decision Trees, Support Vector Machines, K-nearest neighbors, and Random Forest. The study applies data pre-processing techniques to improve detection performance and assesses the algorithms using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Among the tested methods, Random Forest and Decision Trees achieved the highest performance with an accuracy of 97.5%, precision of 1.00, recall of 0.95, and an $F 1$ score of 0.97. SVM demonstrated strong precision at 1.00 but slightly lower accuracy at $\mathbf{9 2. 5 \%}$, while KNN exhibited the lowest accuracy at 85%. These results highlight the effectiveness of Random Forest and Decision Trees for robust and efficient jammer detection. The findings have significant implications for enhancing the resilience of wireless communication systems against jamming attacks. In particular, we show the use-case of our analytical work in the classification-based application of wireless communication systems, specifically jammer detection.

Netaji Subhas University of Technology (IN), Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Earthquake Detection and Analysis
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.