Identification of Hafting Traces on Palaeolithic Stone Tools: Archaeological and Experimental Evidence

The main objective of this paper is to refine the morphological and traceological criteria for identifying hafting traces on the Palaeolithic stone artifacts. After reviewing relevant publications, the authors proceed to the description of their own experiments aimed at the identification of different kinds of macro- and microwear tracers that formed as a result of hafting. The characteristics of these traces depended on the haft material, duration of use, way of attachment, and the involvement of abrasive materials (such as ochre or soil). Some of the obtained results defy conventional wisdom. For example, the shiny spots known as “G-type polish” and often thought to be signs of handle use, are not always reliable. Likewise, contrary to a widely accepted view, such factors as the tool morphology and the craftsman’s strength have little effect on the traces of hafting. The results of this study show that many factors can randomly influence the wear, and to better understand this process the role of each factor has to be studied in more detail.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Stratum plus Archaeology and Cultural Anthropology
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55086/sp251251283
Primary Topic
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of Hafting Traces on Palaeolithic Stone Tools: Archaeological and Experimental Evidence

Yaroslav Ivanov, Kseniia Stepanova, Vasilisa Smolkina
Stratum plus Archaeology and Cultural Anthropology
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
article

Identification of Hafting Traces on Palaeolithic Stone Tools: Archaeological and Experimental Evidence

Yaroslav Ivanov, Kseniia Stepanova, Vasilisa Smolkina
article en

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to refine the morphological and traceological criteria for identifying hafting traces on the Palaeolithic stone artifacts. After reviewing relevant publications, the authors proceed to the description of their own experiments aimed at the identification of different kinds of macro- and microwear tracers that formed as a result of hafting. The characteristics of these traces depended on the haft material, duration of use, way of attachment, and the involvement of abrasive materials (such as ochre or soil). Some of the obtained results defy conventional wisdom. For example, the shiny spots known as “G-type polish” and often thought to be signs of handle use, are not always reliable. Likewise, contrary to a widely accepted view, such factors as the tool morphology and the craftsman’s strength have little effect on the traces of hafting. The results of this study show that many factors can randomly influence the wear, and to better understand this process the role of each factor has to be studied in more detail.

Stratum plus Archaeology and Cultural Anthropology(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.