Comparing Two Methods of Disparity Analysis of the Anterior Portion of m1 in Gray Voles (Rodentia, Arvicolini) in a Model Sample: Frequency Analysis of Morphotypes and Geometric Morphometrics

An analysis of the disparity of the anterior portion of the m1 shape in gray voles in an artificial sample consisting of five groups with different frequency distributions of five morphotypes was carried out. Two main approaches were applied: (a) traditional analysis of the frequency distribution of discrete morphotypes and (b) geometric morphometrics based on a strictly quantitative description of the shape of anterior portion. It is shown that both approaches give very similar results, while geometric morphometry has a number of important advantages. This approach is recommended as the main one instead of the traditional one.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biology Bulletin
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s1062359024701607
Primary Topic
Morphological variations and asymmetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Two Methods of Disparity Analysis of the Anterior Portion of m1 in Gray Voles (Rodentia, Arvicolini) in a Model Sample: Frequency Analysis of Morphotypes and Geometric Morphometrics

Igor Ya. Pavlinov
Biology Bulletin
Morphological variations and asymmetry
article

Comparing Two Methods of Disparity Analysis of the Anterior Portion of m1 in Gray Voles (Rodentia, Arvicolini) in a Model Sample: Frequency Analysis of Morphotypes and Geometric Morphometrics

Igor Ya. Pavlinov
article en

Abstract

An analysis of the disparity of the anterior portion of the m1 shape in gray voles in an artificial sample consisting of five groups with different frequency distributions of five morphotypes was carried out. Two main approaches were applied: (a) traditional analysis of the frequency distribution of discrete morphotypes and (b) geometric morphometrics based on a strictly quantitative description of the shape of anterior portion. It is shown that both approaches give very similar results, while geometric morphometry has a number of important advantages. This approach is recommended as the main one instead of the traditional one.

Biology BulletinVol. 51(9)
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Morphological variations and asymmetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.