Patients’ and doctors’ preferences in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treatment in Asia–Pacific: a multi-territory discrete choice experiment using a cross-sectional survey

While our study revealed a concordance between patients' and doctors' ranking of the seven assessed treatment attributes, patients generally assigned greater emphasis on safety-related attributes in comparison to doctors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Open
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088505
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patients’ and doctors’ preferences in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treatment in Asia–Pacific: a multi-territory discrete choice experiment using a cross-sectional survey

Jiun‐I Lai, Danny Hsu, Carmel Spiteri, Ma. Lourdes A. Tiambeng et al.
BMJ Open
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Patients’ and doctors’ preferences in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treatment in Asia–Pacific: a multi-territory discrete choice experiment using a cross-sectional survey

Jiun‐I Lai, Danny Hsu, Carmel Spiteri, Ma. Lourdes A. Tiambeng, Soo Yeon Ihm, Kyung Hae Jung, Ling‐Ming Tseng, Ee Min Tan, Shuli Qu, Chikako Shimizu, Yoland Antill
article en

Abstract

While our study revealed a concordance between patients' and doctors' ranking of the seven assessed treatment attributes, patients generally assigned greater emphasis on safety-related attributes in comparison to doctors.

BMJ OpenVol. 15(3)
Ulsan College (KR), Chinese General Hospital and Medical Center (PH), Asan Medical Center (KR), Frankston Hospital (AU), Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TW), IQVIA (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Ulsan (KR), National Center for Global Health and Medicine (JP), MSD (Australia) (AU), MSD (South Korea) (KR), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.