Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Groups May Have Underused The Emergency Department For Nonavoidable Visits, 2018–22

In the decades preceding the COVID-19 pandemic, emergency department (ED) use increased more rapidly for socioeconomically disadvantaged patients than for advantaged patients, often because of barriers to accessing office-based care. However, it remains unknown whether the pandemic has had durable effects on socioeconomic disparities in ED use. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of ED visits in the US, using multipayer claims data. We used a difference-in-differences approach to compare ED visit rates between March 2020 and August 2022 with rates from the same months of 2018-19. Among 15.6 million ED visits, potentially avoidable visits persistently declined for all insured populations during the pandemic period. Potentially nonavoidable visits also declined early in the pandemic but rebounded to more than 95 percent of expected rates. However, stratifying by insurance revealed that this rebound occurred among commercially insured and Medicare fee-for-service patients; potentially nonavoidable visits only returned to about 75 percent of expected rates among Medicaid and dual-eligible patients. Although this suggests a beneficial reduction in potentially avoidable ED use, it also indicates the simultaneous emergence of a disparity wherein socioeconomically disadvantaged groups may be underusing the ED for potentially higher-acuity illness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Affairs
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00815
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Groups May Have Underused The Emergency Department For Nonavoidable Visits, 2018–22

Richard K. Leuchter, Melody Craff, John N. Mafi, Catherine A. Sarkisian et al.
1 citations
Health Affairs
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
2.25
article

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Groups May Have Underused The Emergency Department For Nonavoidable Visits, 2018–22

Richard K. Leuchter, Melody Craff, John N. Mafi, Catherine A. Sarkisian, Michael G.‏ Hadfield, Cheryl L. Damberg, Cyrus Tabatabai-Yazdi, Chi‐Hong Tseng, Julia Cave Arbanas, Sitaram Vangala, Dale Skinner, Katherine L. Kahn
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the decades preceding the COVID-19 pandemic, emergency department (ED) use increased more rapidly for socioeconomically disadvantaged patients than for advantaged patients, often because of barriers to accessing office-based care. However, it remains unknown whether the pandemic has had durable effects on socioeconomic disparities in ED use. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of ED visits in the US, using multipayer claims data. We used a difference-in-differences approach to compare ED visit rates between March 2020 and August 2022 with rates from the same months of 2018-19. Among 15.6 million ED visits, potentially avoidable visits persistently declined for all insured populations during the pandemic period. Potentially nonavoidable visits also declined early in the pandemic but rebounded to more than 95 percent of expected rates. However, stratifying by insurance revealed that this rebound occurred among commercially insured and Medicare fee-for-service patients; potentially nonavoidable visits only returned to about 75 percent of expected rates among Medicaid and dual-eligible patients. Although this suggests a beneficial reduction in potentially avoidable ED use, it also indicates the simultaneous emergence of a disparity wherein socioeconomically disadvantaged groups may be underusing the ED for potentially higher-acuity illness.

Health AffairsVol. 44(3)
RAND Corporation (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of California System (US), Perbanas Institute (ID), Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research (IN), HealthInsight (US), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (US), Milliman (United States) (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
2.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.