Evaluating ChatGPT-4omni in paediatric developmental screening: direct versus sequential prompts

Integrating Large Language Models like ChatGPT-4omni (ChatGPT-4o) into paediatric healthcare could revolutionise developmental screening. This study evaluated ChatGPT-4o's efficacy in paediatric developmental screening using Direct and Sequential Prompting methods compared with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Third Edition. Among 106 paediatric cases, Direct Prompting showed a sensitivity of 73.42% and overall accuracy of 69.81%, while Sequential Prompting had a specificity of 62.96% and overall accuracy of 67.92%. Both methods demonstrate potential for improving the efficiency and accessibility of paediatric developmental screening, with Direct Prompts being more sensitive and Sequential Prompts more specific.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Paediatrics Open
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002809
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating ChatGPT-4omni in paediatric developmental screening: direct versus sequential prompts

Therdpong Thongseiratch, Pathrada Traipidok, Pattra Charleowsak, Nattaporn Tassanakijpanich et al.
1 citations
BMJ Paediatrics Open
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
1.35
article

Evaluating ChatGPT-4omni in paediatric developmental screening: direct versus sequential prompts

Therdpong Thongseiratch, Pathrada Traipidok, Pattra Charleowsak, Nattaporn Tassanakijpanich, Papichaya Srisombundit
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Integrating Large Language Models like ChatGPT-4omni (ChatGPT-4o) into paediatric healthcare could revolutionise developmental screening. This study evaluated ChatGPT-4o's efficacy in paediatric developmental screening using Direct and Sequential Prompting methods compared with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Third Edition. Among 106 paediatric cases, Direct Prompting showed a sensitivity of 73.42% and overall accuracy of 69.81%, while Sequential Prompting had a specificity of 62.96% and overall accuracy of 67.92%. Both methods demonstrate potential for improving the efficiency and accessibility of paediatric developmental screening, with Direct Prompts being more sensitive and Sequential Prompts more specific.

BMJ Paediatrics OpenVol. 9(1)
Prince of Songkla University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.