Louis Althusser aleatorikus materialista történelemelmélete

In my paper I analyze and interpret Louis Althusser’s two main texts written in the 1980’s, the last period of his philosophical activity: The Underground Current of the Materialism of the Encounter and Philosophy and Marxism. Contrary to previous interpretations of these texts, I do not consider them as either primarily ontologically or politically motivated, but as writings inquiring about the role of contingency in history, and thus as a reflection on the possibility of a theory of history which can account for this. In order to argue for the coherence of such a theory, I differentiate between the concepts of contingency and of the aleatory, which are not always clearly contrasted by Althusser. After first analyzing his view on the role of philosophy and the concepts of his “aleatory materialism”, I examine his substantive statements about the characteristics of history, the way his theory reflects on the possible interpretations of history and finally the role of human agency within this theory.

Publication Details

Journal
Kellék Filozófiai folyóirat
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61901/kellek.2024.72.09
Primary Topic
Marxism and Critical Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Louis Althusser aleatorikus materialista történelemelmélete

Kellék Filozófiai folyóirat
Marxism and Critical Theory
article

Louis Althusser aleatorikus materialista történelemelmélete

article en

Abstract

In my paper I analyze and interpret Louis Althusser’s two main texts written in the 1980’s, the last period of his philosophical activity: The Underground Current of the Materialism of the Encounter and Philosophy and Marxism. Contrary to previous interpretations of these texts, I do not consider them as either primarily ontologically or politically motivated, but as writings inquiring about the role of contingency in history, and thus as a reflection on the possibility of a theory of history which can account for this. In order to argue for the coherence of such a theory, I differentiate between the concepts of contingency and of the aleatory, which are not always clearly contrasted by Althusser. After first analyzing his view on the role of philosophy and the concepts of his “aleatory materialism”, I examine his substantive statements about the characteristics of history, the way his theory reflects on the possible interpretations of history and finally the role of human agency within this theory.

Kellék Filozófiai folyóirat(72)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Marxism and Critical Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.