Development of a deep learning-based system for aiding in the determination of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores: an international multicenter study

Background. Prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging is widely recommended prior to biopsy in clinical practice, with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) as the standard tool for guiding diagnosis and treatment decisions. However, analyzing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging data demands substantial expertise, and the process is often time-intensive and cognitively challenging, leading to variability between and within readers.Aim. To create a deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (DL-CAD) system to minimize manual influence on PI-RADS score determination.Materials and methods. Between January 2020 and May 2024, 108 patients with histopathologically confirmed prostate cancer with PI-RADS scores 4–5 were retrospectively selected for model development and training. Additionally, 28 benign cases were included for model validation. Different prostate zones were labeled following PI-RADS v2.1 guidelines to facilitate model selection. Manual segmentation of prostate regions and lesions was performed on T2-weighted (T2W) sequences, and a 3D U-Net architecture was implemented for the DL model using the MONAI framework. Diagnostic performance was assessed using Python-based statistical analysis.Results. The DL-CAD system achieved average accuracy of 78 %, sensitivity of 60 %, and specificity of 84 % for lesion detection. The Dice similarity coefficient for prostate segmentation was 0.71, and the AUROC was 81.16 %.Conclusion. The DL-CAD system demonstrates promise for patients with clinically significant prostate cancer by improving diagnostic accuracy. While it exhibits high specificity, further improvements of sensitivity and segmentation accuracy are necessary. These improvements could be achieved through the use of larger datasets and advanced deep learning techniques, such as transfer learning or ensemble learning, which could enhance sensitivity without compromising specificity. Further multicenter validation is required to accelerate the integration of this system into clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Urology
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2024-20-4-15-23
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a deep learning-based system for aiding in the determination of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores: an international multicenter study

Kebang Hu, Mikhail Enikeev, E V Shpot, M. V. Feldsherov et al.
1 links
Cancer Urology
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Development of a deep learning-based system for aiding in the determination of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores: an international multicenter study

Kebang Hu, Mikhail Enikeev, E V Shpot, M. V. Feldsherov, Л. М. Рапопорт, Petr Glybochko, I. М. Chernenkiy, He Li, Mingze He, R. T. Rzaev
article en

Abstract

Background. Prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging is widely recommended prior to biopsy in clinical practice, with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) as the standard tool for guiding diagnosis and treatment decisions. However, analyzing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging data demands substantial expertise, and the process is often time-intensive and cognitively challenging, leading to variability between and within readers.Aim. To create a deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (DL-CAD) system to minimize manual influence on PI-RADS score determination.Materials and methods. Between January 2020 and May 2024, 108 patients with histopathologically confirmed prostate cancer with PI-RADS scores 4–5 were retrospectively selected for model development and training. Additionally, 28 benign cases were included for model validation. Different prostate zones were labeled following PI-RADS v2.1 guidelines to facilitate model selection. Manual segmentation of prostate regions and lesions was performed on T2-weighted (T2W) sequences, and a 3D U-Net architecture was implemented for the DL model using the MONAI framework. Diagnostic performance was assessed using Python-based statistical analysis.Results. The DL-CAD system achieved average accuracy of 78 %, sensitivity of 60 %, and specificity of 84 % for lesion detection. The Dice similarity coefficient for prostate segmentation was 0.71, and the AUROC was 81.16 %.Conclusion. The DL-CAD system demonstrates promise for patients with clinically significant prostate cancer by improving diagnostic accuracy. While it exhibits high specificity, further improvements of sensitivity and segmentation accuracy are necessary. These improvements could be achieved through the use of larger datasets and advanced deep learning techniques, such as transfer learning or ensemble learning, which could enhance sensitivity without compromising specificity. Further multicenter validation is required to accelerate the integration of this system into clinical practice.

Cancer UrologyVol. 20(4)
Sechenov University (RU), Jilin University (CN), First Hospital of Jilin University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.