AI-Driven Power Gating for Enhanced Energy Efficiency in Superscalar Processors

Amid the rising demand for efficient processors, the challenge has always been to reduce power consumption without compromising performance. FinFET technology has significantly reduced leakage power issues, but dynamic power consumption at lower nodes has reemerged as a concern. Methodologies such as power/clock gating, DVFS, and voltage biasing have been proposed in the past. However, next-generation complex SoC designs at < 7nm technology require rethinking at finer granularity. The power gating methodology proposed by You et al., Roy et al., and PG-instr algorithm [1] reduce power consumption but have performance drawbacks. These techniques cause at least a 2% drop in performance in terms of wake-up latency. Moreover, You et al. and Roy et al. only considered idle time, while PG-instr focuses solely on energy savings. None of them balance idle time and energy savings together, which is crucial for achieving the best performance with low power consumption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/hipcw63042.2024.00055
Citations
1
Primary Topic
3D IC and TSV technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Driven Power Gating for Enhanced Energy Efficiency in Superscalar Processors

Jaynarayan Tudu, Naman Kalra
1 citations
3D IC and TSV technologies
0.21
article

AI-Driven Power Gating for Enhanced Energy Efficiency in Superscalar Processors

Jaynarayan Tudu, Naman Kalra
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Amid the rising demand for efficient processors, the challenge has always been to reduce power consumption without compromising performance. FinFET technology has significantly reduced leakage power issues, but dynamic power consumption at lower nodes has reemerged as a concern. Methodologies such as power/clock gating, DVFS, and voltage biasing have been proposed in the past. However, next-generation complex SoC designs at < 7nm technology require rethinking at finer granularity. The power gating methodology proposed by You et al., Roy et al., and PG-instr algorithm [1] reduce power consumption but have performance drawbacks. These techniques cause at least a 2% drop in performance in terms of wake-up latency. Moreover, You et al. and Roy et al. only considered idle time, while PG-instr focuses solely on energy savings. None of them balance idle time and energy savings together, which is crucial for achieving the best performance with low power consumption.

Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati (IN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
3D IC and TSV technologies
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI-Driven Power Gating for Enhanced Energy Efficiency in Superscalar Processors — Jaynarayan Tudu, Naman Kalra · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS