Pengaruh Sektor Pariwisata Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Kabupaten Banyumas

This research seeks to assess how tourism product characteristics affect destination value, how the image of a destination impacts destination value, and how destination value relates to intentions of loyalty. A quantitative approach and multiple regression analysis were applied in the study. The findings reveal that the C.R value is 0.623 < 1.967 and the p-value is 0.54 > 0.001, leading to the acceptance of H0. This shows that tourism product characteristics do not positively affect destination value. The C.R value is 1.842 < 1.967 and 0.066 > 0.001, resulting in the acceptance of H0. This suggests that the image of a destination does not positively influence destination value either. However, the C.R value is 14.207 > 1.967 and the p-value < 0.001, which means H0 is rejected. This indicates a positive effect of destination value on intentions of loyalty.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ManBiz Journal of Management and Business
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47467/manbiz.v4i1.6700
Primary Topic
Community-based Tourism Development and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pengaruh Sektor Pariwisata Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Kabupaten Banyumas

Faizal Rizky Yuttama, Anggun Sepfiana
ManBiz Journal of Management and Business
Community-based Tourism Development and Sustainability
article

Pengaruh Sektor Pariwisata Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Kabupaten Banyumas

Faizal Rizky Yuttama, Anggun Sepfiana
article en

Abstract

This research seeks to assess how tourism product characteristics affect destination value, how the image of a destination impacts destination value, and how destination value relates to intentions of loyalty. A quantitative approach and multiple regression analysis were applied in the study. The findings reveal that the C.R value is 0.623 < 1.967 and the p-value is 0.54 > 0.001, leading to the acceptance of H0. This shows that tourism product characteristics do not positively affect destination value. The C.R value is 1.842 < 1.967 and 0.066 > 0.001, resulting in the acceptance of H0. This suggests that the image of a destination does not positively influence destination value either. However, the C.R value is 14.207 > 1.967 and the p-value < 0.001, which means H0 is rejected. This indicates a positive effect of destination value on intentions of loyalty.

ManBiz Journal of Management and BusinessVol. 4(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Community-based Tourism Development and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.