INTEREST INCOME AND INTERNATIONAL TAXATION: PERSPECTIVES FROM INDIA'S JUDICIAL SYSTEM

Taxation of interest income by a resident of one country from investments in India requires the application of Article 11 of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Model Convention (OECD MC) 2017 as well as the United Nations Model Convention (UN MC) 2021 and the domestic provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961, India. This article looks at the Indian judicial system's view of Article 11 of the OECD MC and the UN MC. It concludes that the Indian judicial system has sided with the assessees by giving them the benefit under sub-section (2) of Section 90 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. This section says that taxpayers and assessees can use either the provisions of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) or the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961, India, whichever is better for them. Peoplewho were resident in a country other than India and earned interest from the source in India were taxed at the rate set out in their DTAAs instead of the rate required by the Income-tax Act, 1961, India. This article looks at some cases where this happened

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advanced Research in Commerce Management & Social Science
Published
2025-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62823/ijarcmss/8.1(i).7174
Primary Topic
Economic Development and Regional Competitiveness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INTEREST INCOME AND INTERNATIONAL TAXATION: PERSPECTIVES FROM INDIA'S JUDICIAL SYSTEM

Naveen Mittal
International Journal of Advanced Research in Commerce Management & Social Science
Economic Development and Regional Competitiveness
article

INTEREST INCOME AND INTERNATIONAL TAXATION: PERSPECTIVES FROM INDIA'S JUDICIAL SYSTEM

Naveen Mittal
article en

Abstract

Taxation of interest income by a resident of one country from investments in India requires the application of Article 11 of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Model Convention (OECD MC) 2017 as well as the United Nations Model Convention (UN MC) 2021 and the domestic provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961, India. This article looks at the Indian judicial system's view of Article 11 of the OECD MC and the UN MC. It concludes that the Indian judicial system has sided with the assessees by giving them the benefit under sub-section (2) of Section 90 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. This section says that taxpayers and assessees can use either the provisions of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) or the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961, India, whichever is better for them. Peoplewho were resident in a country other than India and earned interest from the source in India were taxed at the rate set out in their DTAAs instead of the rate required by the Income-tax Act, 1961, India. This article looks at some cases where this happened

International Journal of Advanced Research in Commerce Management & Social ScienceVol. 08(01(I))
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Economic Development and Regional Competitiveness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

INTEREST INCOME AND INTERNATIONAL TAXATION: PERSPECTIVES FROM INDIA'S JUDICIAL SYSTEM — Naveen Mittal · International Journal of Advanced Research in Commerce Management & Social Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS