Carbon Footprint and Energy Relationship: Fossil Fuel Vehicles and Electric Vehicles in Turkey

As technology advances today, energy demand is also increasing, with approximately 85% of this demand being met by fossil fuels. The use of fossil fuels leads to the release of greenhouse gases, which are known to be one of the main causes of global warming. Although electrical energy is the most common and easily accessible form of energy, it is not found in nature and must be produced from other energy sources. Renewable energy sources, on the other hand, are not yet sufficient in terms of both cost and meeting energy demand. Therefore, additional taxation is being planned on countries and businesses that use fossil fuels with high greenhouse gas emissions. In this context, the carbon footprint becomes an important parameter for measuring polluting effects. However, calculating the carbon footprint is quite complex, which makes it challenging to ensure fair taxation in energy production and consumption. Thus, it would be fairer to base additional taxation on the amount of greenhouse gases produced per capita in a country. According to calculations, the global average per capita emission of fossil fuel-based greenhouse gases is around 5300 kg. Saudi Arabia and the UAE, as major oil producers, are responsible for producing 15 times this average, while Kuwait is responsible for 23 times the average. The largest energy consumers, such as the United States and Russia, emit three times the average, while Germany, Japan, and China contribute approximately twice the amount. For Turkey, this value is around 1.5 times the global average. Recently, electric vehicles (EVs), which have been promoted as a more environmentally friendly option, have been compared to conventional vehicles under the conditions in Turkey. Since each country has different sources of electricity generation, the goal of EVs producing fewer greenhouse gases is influenced by these factors. The results of calculations specific to Turkey show that while EVs are more environmentally friendly compared to gasoline and diesel vehicles, the situation is more complex and debatable for LPG-powered vehicles.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ENERGY ENVIRONMENT & STORAGE
Published
2025-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52924/unid7171
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon Footprint and Energy Relationship: Fossil Fuel Vehicles and Electric Vehicles in Turkey

Sebahattin Ünalan, Evrim Özrahat, Fatih Gürlek
1 links
ENERGY ENVIRONMENT & STORAGE
Energy and Environment Impacts
article

Carbon Footprint and Energy Relationship: Fossil Fuel Vehicles and Electric Vehicles in Turkey

Sebahattin Ünalan, Evrim Özrahat, Fatih Gürlek
article en

Abstract

As technology advances today, energy demand is also increasing, with approximately 85% of this demand being met by fossil fuels. The use of fossil fuels leads to the release of greenhouse gases, which are known to be one of the main causes of global warming. Although electrical energy is the most common and easily accessible form of energy, it is not found in nature and must be produced from other energy sources. Renewable energy sources, on the other hand, are not yet sufficient in terms of both cost and meeting energy demand. Therefore, additional taxation is being planned on countries and businesses that use fossil fuels with high greenhouse gas emissions. In this context, the carbon footprint becomes an important parameter for measuring polluting effects. However, calculating the carbon footprint is quite complex, which makes it challenging to ensure fair taxation in energy production and consumption. Thus, it would be fairer to base additional taxation on the amount of greenhouse gases produced per capita in a country. According to calculations, the global average per capita emission of fossil fuel-based greenhouse gases is around 5300 kg. Saudi Arabia and the UAE, as major oil producers, are responsible for producing 15 times this average, while Kuwait is responsible for 23 times the average. The largest energy consumers, such as the United States and Russia, emit three times the average, while Germany, Japan, and China contribute approximately twice the amount. For Turkey, this value is around 1.5 times the global average. Recently, electric vehicles (EVs), which have been promoted as a more environmentally friendly option, have been compared to conventional vehicles under the conditions in Turkey. Since each country has different sources of electricity generation, the goal of EVs producing fewer greenhouse gases is influenced by these factors. The results of calculations specific to Turkey show that while EVs are more environmentally friendly compared to gasoline and diesel vehicles, the situation is more complex and debatable for LPG-powered vehicles.

ENERGY ENVIRONMENT & STORAGEVol. 5(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Energy and Environment Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Carbon Footprint and Energy Relationship: Fossil Fuel Vehicles and Electric Vehicles in Turkey — Sebahattin Ünalan, Evrim Özrahat, et al. · ENERGY ENVIRONMENT & STORAGE (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS