Thoracic Mobilization Versus Sling-Based Thoracic Active Exercises on Pain, Function and Quality of Life in Patients with Non-specific Neck Pain

Background: Non-specific neck pain is the type of neck pain which has no pathognomonic signs and symptoms or has no underlying condition. It is estimated that 70% of the population may suffer from non-specific neck pain at some point in their life. Objective: To find out the effects of thoracic mobilization versus sling-based thoracic active exercises on pain, function and quality of life in patients with non-specific neck pain. Methods: This randomized trial was conducted at the Physiotherapy Department of the University of Lahore Teaching Hospital. Participants aged 20 to 45 years, diagnosed patients of non-specific neck pain were included in the study. Patients with any neurological disease, previous surgical history, pregnancy, or cardiac disease were excluded. Group A performed cervical manual therapy for and sling-based active thoracic exercises. While Group B performed cervical manual therapy and thoracic mobilization. A numeric pain rating scale, neck disability index and short form-36 questionnaire were used to measure pain, function and quality of life respectively. Mann-Whitney U and Friedman tests were applied to identify within-group differences in both groups. Results: The mean rank for pain score in group A at the baseline was 31.42 and in group B 21.58 with a Z value of -2.437 and a p-value is 0.015. At the end of the treatment 4th week, the mean rank for pain in group A was 16.65 and in group B 36.35 with a Z value of -4.851 and a p-value is 0.00. The mean rank for neck disability index score in group A at the baseline was 27.94 and in group B 25.06 with a Z value of -1.158 and p-value is 0.247. At the end of the treatment 4th week, the mean rank for disability score in-group A was 22.50 and in-group B 30.50 with a Z value of -3.045 and a p-value is 0.02. Conclusion: Both groups showed significant improvements but Group A had more pronounced effects. Thoracic mobilization provides faster short-term relief but the active nature of sling-based exercises offers more sustainable benefits in long-term management of pain and patient wellbeing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences
Published
2025-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55735/hjprs.v4i6.292
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thoracic Mobilization Versus Sling-Based Thoracic Active Exercises on Pain, Function and Quality of Life in Patients with Non-specific Neck Pain

Muhammad Sarfraz Khan, Samer Zehra, Iqra Waseem, Amjed Ali et al.
The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Thoracic Mobilization Versus Sling-Based Thoracic Active Exercises on Pain, Function and Quality of Life in Patients with Non-specific Neck Pain

Muhammad Sarfraz Khan, Samer Zehra, Iqra Waseem, Amjed Ali, Ayesha Naeem, Hafsa Chandio
article en

Abstract

Background: Non-specific neck pain is the type of neck pain which has no pathognomonic signs and symptoms or has no underlying condition. It is estimated that 70% of the population may suffer from non-specific neck pain at some point in their life. Objective: To find out the effects of thoracic mobilization versus sling-based thoracic active exercises on pain, function and quality of life in patients with non-specific neck pain. Methods: This randomized trial was conducted at the Physiotherapy Department of the University of Lahore Teaching Hospital. Participants aged 20 to 45 years, diagnosed patients of non-specific neck pain were included in the study. Patients with any neurological disease, previous surgical history, pregnancy, or cardiac disease were excluded. Group A performed cervical manual therapy for and sling-based active thoracic exercises. While Group B performed cervical manual therapy and thoracic mobilization. A numeric pain rating scale, neck disability index and short form-36 questionnaire were used to measure pain, function and quality of life respectively. Mann-Whitney U and Friedman tests were applied to identify within-group differences in both groups. Results: The mean rank for pain score in group A at the baseline was 31.42 and in group B 21.58 with a Z value of -2.437 and a p-value is 0.015. At the end of the treatment 4th week, the mean rank for pain in group A was 16.65 and in group B 36.35 with a Z value of -4.851 and a p-value is 0.00. The mean rank for neck disability index score in group A at the baseline was 27.94 and in group B 25.06 with a Z value of -1.158 and p-value is 0.247. At the end of the treatment 4th week, the mean rank for disability score in-group A was 22.50 and in-group B 30.50 with a Z value of -3.045 and a p-value is 0.02. Conclusion: Both groups showed significant improvements but Group A had more pronounced effects. Thoracic mobilization provides faster short-term relief but the active nature of sling-based exercises offers more sustainable benefits in long-term management of pain and patient wellbeing.

The Healer Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation SciencesVol. 4(6)
University of Lahore (PK), Dow University of Health Sciences (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.