River Waste to Goldmine: A Tale of Floating Agriculture in Vulnerable Southern Regions of Bangladesh

ABSTRACT Floating agriculture transforms marshy lands into productive resources, enhancing food security and rural incomes in climate‐vulnerable areas. While prior research highlights its potential as a climate‐resilient practice, gaps remain in understanding the determinants of adoption and long‐term livelihood impacts. Our study addresses these gaps by examining farming procedures, profitability, impacts, and the key drivers and challenges influencing floating agriculture adoption in southern Bangladesh. Data was collected from 158 farmers using a pre‐tested questionnaire between October 2018 and April 2019. Profit function and logit regression models were applied to analyze profitability and socio‐economic determinants, complemented by qualitative methods and causal loop diagrams to assess impacts. Findings reveal that farmers employ both intercropping and monocropping, with a preference for seedling raising (156.37 USD/100 m 2 ) over vegetable cultivation (121.56 USD/100 m 2 ) due to higher profitability. Despite its labor‐intensive nature (73% labor costs for seedling rising vs. 85% for vegetable cultivation), floating agriculture boosts household income, meets local vegetable demand, and reduces reliance on external markets during shocks. Additionally, it provides ecological benefits such as waterweed management and reduced environmental pollution. Floating agriculture also alleviates poverty by enhancing agricultural production and generating a positive feedback loop of increased income, food availability, and improved nutrition and health. Adoption is influenced by age, experience, family size, income diversity, credit access, extension services, and market proximity. However, high capital costs, limited credit, market volatility, and biotic/abiotic stresses pose challenges. To scale up floating agriculture, policy measures should focus on financial support, technical training, cost‐effective innovations, and fostering cooperative farming. Institutional backing is crucial for promoting this sustainable cleaner production practice in flood‐prone regions of Bangladesh and similar global contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food and Energy Security
Published
2025-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.70062
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

River Waste to Goldmine: A Tale of Floating Agriculture in Vulnerable Southern Regions of Bangladesh

Nanda Dulal Kundu, Andrew M. McKenzie, Md. Hayder Khan Sujan, Md. Alimur Rahman et al.
1 citations
Food and Energy Security
Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
2.27
article

River Waste to Goldmine: A Tale of Floating Agriculture in Vulnerable Southern Regions of Bangladesh

Nanda Dulal Kundu, Andrew M. McKenzie, Md. Hayder Khan Sujan, Md. Alimur Rahman, Md Abdur Rouf Sarkar, Mou Rani Sarker, Humnath Bhandari, Md. Monjurul Islam, Md. Shad Salman, Md. Taj Uddin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Floating agriculture transforms marshy lands into productive resources, enhancing food security and rural incomes in climate‐vulnerable areas. While prior research highlights its potential as a climate‐resilient practice, gaps remain in understanding the determinants of adoption and long‐term livelihood impacts. Our study addresses these gaps by examining farming procedures, profitability, impacts, and the key drivers and challenges influencing floating agriculture adoption in southern Bangladesh. Data was collected from 158 farmers using a pre‐tested questionnaire between October 2018 and April 2019. Profit function and logit regression models were applied to analyze profitability and socio‐economic determinants, complemented by qualitative methods and causal loop diagrams to assess impacts. Findings reveal that farmers employ both intercropping and monocropping, with a preference for seedling raising (156.37 USD/100 m 2 ) over vegetable cultivation (121.56 USD/100 m 2 ) due to higher profitability. Despite its labor‐intensive nature (73% labor costs for seedling rising vs. 85% for vegetable cultivation), floating agriculture boosts household income, meets local vegetable demand, and reduces reliance on external markets during shocks. Additionally, it provides ecological benefits such as waterweed management and reduced environmental pollution. Floating agriculture also alleviates poverty by enhancing agricultural production and generating a positive feedback loop of increased income, food availability, and improved nutrition and health. Adoption is influenced by age, experience, family size, income diversity, credit access, extension services, and market proximity. However, high capital costs, limited credit, market volatility, and biotic/abiotic stresses pose challenges. To scale up floating agriculture, policy measures should focus on financial support, technical training, cost‐effective innovations, and fostering cooperative farming. Institutional backing is crucial for promoting this sustainable cleaner production practice in flood‐prone regions of Bangladesh and similar global contexts.

Food and Energy SecurityVol. 14(2)
Zhongnan University of Economics and Law (CN), The University of Queensland (AU), Bangladesh Agricultural University (BD), Agriculture and Food (AU), Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BD), University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US), Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BD), Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
2.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.