The profile and clinical predicting effect of non-rash dermatologic toxicity related to targeted therapy in stage-IV non-small cell lung cancer patients

Dermatologic toxicities associated with targeted therapies may impact drug intolerance and predict drug response, among which rash is most frequently reported and well delineated. However, the profile and effect of non-rash dermatologic toxicity are not fully understood. We identified stage-IV non-small cell lung cancer patients diagnosed at Mayo Clinic in 2006-2019 and systematically analyzed demographics, targeted agents, toxicity, response, and survival outcomes of patients who received targeted therapy. Five toxicity subgroups-none, only non-rash dermatologic, concurrent non-rash and rash (concurrent) dermatologic, only rash, and others-were compared; multivariable survival analyses employed Cox Proportional Hazard models. This study included 533 patients who had taken targeted therapies: 36 (6.8%) had no toxicity, 26 (4.9%) only non-rash dermatologic, 193 (36.2%) only rash, 134 (25.1%) concurrent dermatologic, 144 (27.0%) other toxicities. Non-rash dermatologic toxicities predominately included xerosis (12.8%), pruritus (8.5%), paronychia (7.0%). Rash was the most frequent (59.4%) and the earliest occurring (21 median onset days [MOD]) dermatologic toxicity; paronychia was the latest (69 MOD) occurring. In 329 epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors-treated patients with dermatologic toxicity, mild toxicity occurred the most frequently in patients with only non-rash (81.8%), then those with only rash (64.8%), and the least in the concurrent (50.4%, P=0.013). Patients with concurrent dermatologic toxicities had a significantly higher response rate (67.9%) than those with only non-rash (53.8%) or only rash (41.1%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated concurrent dermatologic toxicity independently predicted a lower risk of death (harzard ratio [HR] 0.48 [0.30-0.77], p < 0.001). Compared to rash, non-rash dermatologic toxicity might be a stronger predictor of better treatment response and longer survival in patients who received targeted therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BioScience Trends
Published
2025-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2024.01424
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The profile and clinical predicting effect of non-rash dermatologic toxicity related to targeted therapy in stage-IV non-small cell lung cancer patients

Vinicius Ernani, Pedro Reck dos Santos, Jonathan D’Cunha, Jason A. Wampfler et al.
BioScience Trends
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
article

The profile and clinical predicting effect of non-rash dermatologic toxicity related to targeted therapy in stage-IV non-small cell lung cancer patients

Vinicius Ernani, Pedro Reck dos Santos, Jonathan D’Cunha, Jason A. Wampfler, Ping Yang, Collin M. Costello, Nikhila Kosuru, Ashok V. Kumar, Yanmei Peng, Zhaoheng Liu, Zhong Gu
article en

Abstract

Dermatologic toxicities associated with targeted therapies may impact drug intolerance and predict drug response, among which rash is most frequently reported and well delineated. However, the profile and effect of non-rash dermatologic toxicity are not fully understood. We identified stage-IV non-small cell lung cancer patients diagnosed at Mayo Clinic in 2006-2019 and systematically analyzed demographics, targeted agents, toxicity, response, and survival outcomes of patients who received targeted therapy. Five toxicity subgroups-none, only non-rash dermatologic, concurrent non-rash and rash (concurrent) dermatologic, only rash, and others-were compared; multivariable survival analyses employed Cox Proportional Hazard models. This study included 533 patients who had taken targeted therapies: 36 (6.8%) had no toxicity, 26 (4.9%) only non-rash dermatologic, 193 (36.2%) only rash, 134 (25.1%) concurrent dermatologic, 144 (27.0%) other toxicities. Non-rash dermatologic toxicities predominately included xerosis (12.8%), pruritus (8.5%), paronychia (7.0%). Rash was the most frequent (59.4%) and the earliest occurring (21 median onset days [MOD]) dermatologic toxicity; paronychia was the latest (69 MOD) occurring. In 329 epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors-treated patients with dermatologic toxicity, mild toxicity occurred the most frequently in patients with only non-rash (81.8%), then those with only rash (64.8%), and the least in the concurrent (50.4%, P=0.013). Patients with concurrent dermatologic toxicities had a significantly higher response rate (67.9%) than those with only non-rash (53.8%) or only rash (41.1%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated concurrent dermatologic toxicity independently predicted a lower risk of death (harzard ratio [HR] 0.48 [0.30-0.77], p < 0.001). Compared to rash, non-rash dermatologic toxicity might be a stronger predictor of better treatment response and longer survival in patients who received targeted therapy.

BioScience TrendsVol. 19(2)
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Mayo Clinic Health System (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic Hospital (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission, National Institutes of Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.