Who Controls Campaign Props? Authority and Power in the Election Quiet Period

During the election quiet period, campaign activities, including the use of Campaign Props (APK), are strictly prohibited. This study investigates the authority to regulate and remove APKs during this critical phase. Employing a normative doctrinal research method, the study reveals that Election Participants hold primary responsibility for removing APKs. However, if they fail to comply, Regional Governments are empowered to act, citing the need to maintain public order, cleanliness, and aesthetic standards. Such actions must be coordinated with the Election Commission (KPU) and Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) to ensure proper documentation and facilitate sanction recommendations against non-compliant participants. This research highlights the urgent need for clearer regulatory enforcement mechanisms to uphold fairness and order during elections, contributing to the broader discourse on electoral governance and accountability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Yustisia Tirtayasa Jurnal Tugas Akhir
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51825/yta.v4i4.30248
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Controls Campaign Props? Authority and Power in the Election Quiet Period

Lia Riesta Dewi, Muhammad Lutfi, Azmi Polem, Qotrun Nida et al.
Yustisia Tirtayasa Jurnal Tugas Akhir
Social Media and Politics
article

Who Controls Campaign Props? Authority and Power in the Election Quiet Period

Lia Riesta Dewi, Muhammad Lutfi, Azmi Polem, Qotrun Nida, Lili Suriyanti
article en

Abstract

During the election quiet period, campaign activities, including the use of Campaign Props (APK), are strictly prohibited. This study investigates the authority to regulate and remove APKs during this critical phase. Employing a normative doctrinal research method, the study reveals that Election Participants hold primary responsibility for removing APKs. However, if they fail to comply, Regional Governments are empowered to act, citing the need to maintain public order, cleanliness, and aesthetic standards. Such actions must be coordinated with the Election Commission (KPU) and Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) to ensure proper documentation and facilitate sanction recommendations against non-compliant participants. This research highlights the urgent need for clearer regulatory enforcement mechanisms to uphold fairness and order during elections, contributing to the broader discourse on electoral governance and accountability.

Yustisia Tirtayasa Jurnal Tugas AkhirVol. 4(4)
Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Who Controls Campaign Props? Authority and Power in the Election Quiet Period — Lia Riesta Dewi, Muhammad Lutfi, et al. · Yustisia Tirtayasa Jurnal Tugas Akhir (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS