Count data, rates, rate differences, and rate ratios in meta‐analysis: A tutorial

This tutorial focuses on trials that assess outcomes by counting events that can occur zero, one, or more than one time in each participant. Trials and meta-analyses can estimate treatment effects for count outcomes using rate differences or rate ratios. We explain why it may be appropriate to meta-analyze count data to estimate rate ratios rather than odds ratios, risk ratios, or risk differences. We explain what count data are, how trials may estimate treatment effects, how to interpret such estimates, and how to extract data from trials that use count outcomes for meta-analysis. Finally, we discuss some common misunderstandings and subtleties. Supplementary materials include an Excel file for performing calculations, mathematical background, and additional advice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cesm.70022
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Count data, rates, rate differences, and rate ratios in meta‐analysis: A tutorial

Christopher James Rose, Matteo Bruschettini, M. Geist
4 citations
Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
5.59
article

Count data, rates, rate differences, and rate ratios in meta‐analysis: A tutorial

Christopher James Rose, Matteo Bruschettini, M. Geist
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This tutorial focuses on trials that assess outcomes by counting events that can occur zero, one, or more than one time in each participant. Trials and meta-analyses can estimate treatment effects for count outcomes using rate differences or rate ratios. We explain why it may be appropriate to meta-analyze count data to estimate rate ratios rather than odds ratios, risk ratios, or risk differences. We explain what count data are, how trials may estimate treatment effects, how to interpret such estimates, and how to extract data from trials that use count outcomes for meta-analysis. Finally, we discuss some common misunderstandings and subtleties. Supplementary materials include an Excel file for performing calculations, mathematical background, and additional advice.

Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and MethodsVol. 3(2)
Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO), Lund University (SE), Zimmer Biomet (Germany) (DE), Skåne University Hospital (SE), Innovation Skåne (Sweden) (SE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
5.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.