Incest in India: A Historical Perspective and Cultural Context
Incest, defined as sexual relations between close relatives, has been viewed through varied lenses in India's historical and cultural narratives. This phenomenon, while largely taboo in modern times, finds nuanced interpretations in India's ancient texts, mythologies, and societal practices. Ancient Indian scriptures and epics occasionally depict relationships that could be interpreted as incestuous, though often within symbolic or mythological frameworks. Additionally, kinship systems in specific communities, such as cousin marriages in South India, blur the modern understanding of incest, highlighting cultural variability. In ancient royal lineages, strategic intra-family unions were sometimes practiced to preserve purity and consolidate power. However, such practices were exceptions rather than societal norms. Over time, the prohibition of incest became a central tenet of Hindu gotra and varna systems, reinforced by religious and social sanctions. These norms were formalized through texts like the Manu smriti, which explicitly forbade sexual relations within defined kinship bounds. Cultural diversity further shaped the perception of incest. Legal frameworks introduced during the colonial period and codified in post-independence India reinforced prohibitions against incestuous relations, framing them as criminal offenses. This abstract examines incest in India by exploring its historical roots, religious interpretations, cultural contexts, and legal frameworks, offering a comprehensive understanding of how societal norms around kinship and taboo have evolved over time.
Authors
- Chintan Nanda (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6502-2145)
- Rajesh Kumar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4764-7656)
Institutions
- Maharaja Engineering College (IN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- RESEARCH HUB International Multidisciplinary Research Journal
- Published
- 2025-01-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.53573/rhimrj.2025.v12n1.011
- Primary Topic
- Economic Theory and Policy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00