Estimated health impacts of reformulation resulting from Health Star Rating nutrition labelling in Aotearoa New Zealand

We aimed to model the impact of product reformulation following adoption of the Health Star Rating (HSR) nutrition labelling system in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ). Household panel data (2014-19) was used to estimate the effect of HSR labels on product nutrient content. Observed changes were applied to population dietary intakes. Impacts were modelled through to Health Adjusted Life Years (HALYs) and health sector costs (NZ$2011 consumer price index (CPI) adjusted to NZ$2023) using a proportional multi-state life-table (pMSLT) model over the remaining life of the 2011 NZ population (<i>n </i>= 4.4 million, 3% discounted). Modelling the current HSR uptake (23% products on average), NZ adults' mean daily energy, sodium and fibre intakes changed by 0.7 KJ (0.0%), -18.2 mg (-0.5%) and 0.04 g (0.2%). This resulted in 700 (95% uncertainty interval (UI): -600-1,800) HALYs gained, and estimated net costs (combining intervention costs and health system cost savings) of $8.4 million (M, 95% UI: -$17.4 to $35.4M). An estimated 24,300 HALYs (95% UI: 19,400-29,900) and $568.1M (95% UI: $430.1 to $733.7M) cost savings were seen if the HSR was made mandatory in 2025. The results of the current HSR uptake find minimal reformulation causing very small changes in population nutrient intake and therefore resulting in small health gains. Mandatory HSR nutrition labels could deliver population health gains and health sector cost savings through reformulation. There is, however, real uncertainty around the scheme's effect on energy intake which will affect these impacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Published
2025-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2025.2455499
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimated health impacts of reformulation resulting from Health Star Rating nutrition labelling in Aotearoa New Zealand

Christine Cleghorn, Cliona Ní Mhurchú, Laxman Bablani, Tony Blakely
1 citations
Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
1.88
article

Estimated health impacts of reformulation resulting from Health Star Rating nutrition labelling in Aotearoa New Zealand

Christine Cleghorn, Cliona Ní Mhurchú, Laxman Bablani, Tony Blakely
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We aimed to model the impact of product reformulation following adoption of the Health Star Rating (HSR) nutrition labelling system in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ). Household panel data (2014-19) was used to estimate the effect of HSR labels on product nutrient content. Observed changes were applied to population dietary intakes. Impacts were modelled through to Health Adjusted Life Years (HALYs) and health sector costs (NZ$2011 consumer price index (CPI) adjusted to NZ$2023) using a proportional multi-state life-table (pMSLT) model over the remaining life of the 2011 NZ population (<i>n </i>= 4.4 million, 3% discounted). Modelling the current HSR uptake (23% products on average), NZ adults' mean daily energy, sodium and fibre intakes changed by 0.7 KJ (0.0%), -18.2 mg (-0.5%) and 0.04 g (0.2%). This resulted in 700 (95% uncertainty interval (UI): -600-1,800) HALYs gained, and estimated net costs (combining intervention costs and health system cost savings) of $8.4 million (M, 95% UI: -$17.4 to $35.4M). An estimated 24,300 HALYs (95% UI: 19,400-29,900) and $568.1M (95% UI: $430.1 to $733.7M) cost savings were seen if the HSR was made mandatory in 2025. The results of the current HSR uptake find minimal reformulation causing very small changes in population nutrient intake and therefore resulting in small health gains. Mandatory HSR nutrition labels could deliver population health gains and health sector cost savings through reformulation. There is, however, real uncertainty around the scheme's effect on energy intake which will affect these impacts.

Journal of the Royal Society of New ZealandVol. 55(6)
University of Auckland (NZ), The University of Melbourne (AU), The George Institute for Global Health (GB), The George Institute for Global Health (AU), University of Otago (NZ)
Health Research Council of New Zealand
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.