COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF BACKWARD WALKING TRAINING AND STANDING BALANCE TRAINING ON WALKING SPEED AND BALANCE IN PATIENTS WITH SUB-ACUTE STROKE

Background: Stroke is a neurological disorder characterized by motor impairments and functional limitations, requiring timely rehabilitation to restore mobility and balance. In the sub-acute phase, effective interventions are crucial for optimizing recovery and reducing fall risks. Backward walking training (BWT) has emerged as a promising technique to enhance gait and balance by leveraging neuroplasticity. This study compares the effects of BWT and standing balance training (SBT) on walking speed and balance in individuals undergoing sub-acute stroke rehabilitation. Objective: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of backward walking training and standing balance training on improving walking speed and balance in patients during the sub-acute phase of stroke rehabilitation. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 60 sub-acute stroke patients aged 18–50 years, using non-probability convenience sampling. Participants were randomly assigned into two groups: Group A received BWT combined with task-oriented and standard rehabilitation, while Group B received SBT alongside similar therapies. Outcomes were measured at baseline, after the 2nd week, and at the 4th week using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6-MWT), 3-Meter Backward Walk Test (3-MBWT), and Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Statistical analyses included repeated measures ANOVA for intragroup comparisons and independent sample t-tests for intergroup differences, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Group A showed significant improvements, with 6-MWT scores increasing from 0.24 ± 0.03 m/s at baseline to 0.31 ± 0.06 m/s at the 4th week, compared to Group B’s increase from 0.22 ± 0.04 m/s to 0.25 ± 0.06 m/s (p = 0.00). For 3-MBWT, Group A improved from 0.15 ± 0.01 m/s to 0.21 ± 0.03 m/s, while Group B advanced from 0.15 ± 0.02 m/s to 0.18 ± 0.03 m/s (p = 0.00). BBS scores for Group A increased from 28.43 ± 4.34 to 42.03 ± 4.22, outperforming Group B, which improved from 27.32 ± 4.00 to 30.84 ± 3.77 (p = 0.00). Conclusion: Backward walking training significantly outperformed standing balance training in improving both forward and backward walking speed, balance, and gait in sub-acute stroke patients, highlighting its potential as a key rehabilitation strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71000/ijhr174
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF BACKWARD WALKING TRAINING AND STANDING BALANCE TRAINING ON WALKING SPEED AND BALANCE IN PATIENTS WITH SUB-ACUTE STROKE

Zermeen Zerish, Zain Ali, Muhammad Arif Nadeem Saqib, Adiba Javed et al.
1 links
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF BACKWARD WALKING TRAINING AND STANDING BALANCE TRAINING ON WALKING SPEED AND BALANCE IN PATIENTS WITH SUB-ACUTE STROKE

Zermeen Zerish, Zain Ali, Muhammad Arif Nadeem Saqib, Adiba Javed, Muhammad Umer Shabbir, Rafia Ather
article en

Abstract

Background: Stroke is a neurological disorder characterized by motor impairments and functional limitations, requiring timely rehabilitation to restore mobility and balance. In the sub-acute phase, effective interventions are crucial for optimizing recovery and reducing fall risks. Backward walking training (BWT) has emerged as a promising technique to enhance gait and balance by leveraging neuroplasticity. This study compares the effects of BWT and standing balance training (SBT) on walking speed and balance in individuals undergoing sub-acute stroke rehabilitation. Objective: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of backward walking training and standing balance training on improving walking speed and balance in patients during the sub-acute phase of stroke rehabilitation. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 60 sub-acute stroke patients aged 18–50 years, using non-probability convenience sampling. Participants were randomly assigned into two groups: Group A received BWT combined with task-oriented and standard rehabilitation, while Group B received SBT alongside similar therapies. Outcomes were measured at baseline, after the 2nd week, and at the 4th week using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6-MWT), 3-Meter Backward Walk Test (3-MBWT), and Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Statistical analyses included repeated measures ANOVA for intragroup comparisons and independent sample t-tests for intergroup differences, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Group A showed significant improvements, with 6-MWT scores increasing from 0.24 ± 0.03 m/s at baseline to 0.31 ± 0.06 m/s at the 4th week, compared to Group B’s increase from 0.22 ± 0.04 m/s to 0.25 ± 0.06 m/s (p = 0.00). For 3-MBWT, Group A improved from 0.15 ± 0.01 m/s to 0.21 ± 0.03 m/s, while Group B advanced from 0.15 ± 0.02 m/s to 0.18 ± 0.03 m/s (p = 0.00). BBS scores for Group A increased from 28.43 ± 4.34 to 42.03 ± 4.22, outperforming Group B, which improved from 27.32 ± 4.00 to 30.84 ± 3.77 (p = 0.00). Conclusion: Backward walking training significantly outperformed standing balance training in improving both forward and backward walking speed, balance, and gait in sub-acute stroke patients, highlighting its potential as a key rehabilitation strategy.

Insights-Journal of Health and RehabilitationVol. 2(2 (Health & Allied))
Punjab Medical College (PK), Dar Al-Shifa Hospital (PS), Allied Hospital (PK), University of Faisalabad (PK), ProHealth Care (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.