A meta-analysis reveals earthworms as mutualists rather than predators of soil microorganisms

• Earthworms have been showed to increase or decrase microbial abundance and diversity. • Our meta -analysis shows an increased abundance of bacteria (17 %) and fungi (31 %). • Plant presence amplifies earthworm effects on microbial abundance by up to 97 %. • Earthworm impacts are strongest in carbon-rich, nitrogen-rich soils with low pH. • Earthworms are mutualists of microorganisms, rather than predators. Microorganisms constitute the largest biomass on Earth after plants, and earthworms are one of the main components of animal biomass. Both are critical drivers of soil functions and ecosystem services. Studies report either positive or negative effects of earthworms on soil microbial communities, leading to contrasting views on whether microorganisms serve as prey or mutualists for earthworms. This meta -analysis aimed to settle this debate, and examines how biotic and abiotic factors affect earthworm impacts on microbial abundance and diversity. Based on a selective search retaining only genuinely quantitative approaches, we kept 169 observations, showing that, on average, earthworms increased bacterial abundance by 16.5 % and fungal abundance by 31.4 %. Bacterial species richness rose by 8.5 % in the presence of earthworms, but fungal richness was not significantly affected. Epigeic and anecic earthworms had more notable effects than endogeics. Plant presence in experimental designs strongly amplified earthworms’ effects on bacterial (+30 %) and fungal (+97 %) abundances. The largest earthworm-induced effects were observed in carbon- and nitrogen-rich soils and at low pH, while the addition of organic matter reduced these effects. Comparing microbial abundance in earthworm casts to control units without earthworms revealed effect sizes two- to three-fold greater (for bacteria and fungi, respectively) than when using the soil surrounding earthworm casts as a control. Our meta -analysis demonstrates that, despite ingesting some microorganisms, earthworms have a net positive effect on their abundance, positioning them as mutualists rather than predators of bacteria and fungi.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoderma
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117238
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
45.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A meta-analysis reveals earthworms as mutualists rather than predators of soil microorganisms

Patrick Lavelle, Manuel Blouin, Frédérique Reverchon, Isabelle Barois et al.
15 citations
Geoderma
Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
45.40
article

A meta-analysis reveals earthworms as mutualists rather than predators of soil microorganisms

Patrick Lavelle, Manuel Blouin, Frédérique Reverchon, Isabelle Barois, A Robin, Lysandre Amans
article en
15 citations

Abstract

• Earthworms have been showed to increase or decrase microbial abundance and diversity. • Our meta -analysis shows an increased abundance of bacteria (17 %) and fungi (31 %). • Plant presence amplifies earthworm effects on microbial abundance by up to 97 %. • Earthworm impacts are strongest in carbon-rich, nitrogen-rich soils with low pH. • Earthworms are mutualists of microorganisms, rather than predators. Microorganisms constitute the largest biomass on Earth after plants, and earthworms are one of the main components of animal biomass. Both are critical drivers of soil functions and ecosystem services. Studies report either positive or negative effects of earthworms on soil microbial communities, leading to contrasting views on whether microorganisms serve as prey or mutualists for earthworms. This meta -analysis aimed to settle this debate, and examines how biotic and abiotic factors affect earthworm impacts on microbial abundance and diversity. Based on a selective search retaining only genuinely quantitative approaches, we kept 169 observations, showing that, on average, earthworms increased bacterial abundance by 16.5 % and fungal abundance by 31.4 %. Bacterial species richness rose by 8.5 % in the presence of earthworms, but fungal richness was not significantly affected. Epigeic and anecic earthworms had more notable effects than endogeics. Plant presence in experimental designs strongly amplified earthworms’ effects on bacterial (+30 %) and fungal (+97 %) abundances. The largest earthworm-induced effects were observed in carbon- and nitrogen-rich soils and at low pH, while the addition of organic matter reduced these effects. Comparing microbial abundance in earthworm casts to control units without earthworms revealed effect sizes two- to three-fold greater (for bacteria and fungi, respectively) than when using the soil surrounding earthworm casts as a control. Our meta -analysis demonstrates that, despite ingesting some microorganisms, earthworms have a net positive effect on their abundance, positioning them as mutualists rather than predators of bacteria and fungi.

GeodermaVol. 455
Université Sorbonne Nouvelle (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Institut d'écologie et des sciences de l'environnement de Paris (FR), Institut Agro Dijon (FR), Instituto de Ecología (MX), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
45.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.