Effects of Scaffolding and Conventional Instructional Methods on Female Students’ Academic Achievement and Mathematics Anxiety in Geometry

This study aimed to assess the effect of scaffolding and conventional instructional methods on female students’ academic achievement and mathematics anxiety in geometry. The study used a quasi-experimental pre-test and post-test control design. The population comprised 443 SSII female students from 8 public schools in Agaie, Niger State, Nigeria. A sample of 130 SSII students from two schools was selected through multistage sampling. Data were collected through four instruments: Scaffolding lesson model for the experimental group, Conventional lesson model for the control group, Geometry Achievement Test (GAT) and Mathematics Anxiety Questionnaire (MAQ). The instruments were validated by three experts from two University. The reliability index of GAT and MAQ are 0.76 and 0.86 respectively. Research questions were answered through mean (M), standard deviation (SD), and mean difference, while a t-test at 0.05 level of significance was used to analyze the null hypotheses. The findings revealed that female students exposed to the scaffolding instruction method have higher mean scores than those exposed to the conventional instructional method. Based on the results, it is recommended, among others, that teaching mathematics, especially geometry, incorporate scaffolding instruction. Similarly, this method should be incorporated into the methodology and micro-teaching courses of pre-service teachers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Instructional Mathematics
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37640/jim.v5i2.2188
Primary Topic
Educational Research and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Scaffolding and Conventional Instructional Methods on Female Students’ Academic Achievement and Mathematics Anxiety in Geometry

Aliyu Alhaji Zakariyya, Alhassan Dyadya Isa, Manko Umar Ahmad, Abubakar Sadiq Ndagara
Journal of Instructional Mathematics
Educational Research and Pedagogy
article

Effects of Scaffolding and Conventional Instructional Methods on Female Students’ Academic Achievement and Mathematics Anxiety in Geometry

Aliyu Alhaji Zakariyya, Alhassan Dyadya Isa, Manko Umar Ahmad, Abubakar Sadiq Ndagara
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the effect of scaffolding and conventional instructional methods on female students’ academic achievement and mathematics anxiety in geometry. The study used a quasi-experimental pre-test and post-test control design. The population comprised 443 SSII female students from 8 public schools in Agaie, Niger State, Nigeria. A sample of 130 SSII students from two schools was selected through multistage sampling. Data were collected through four instruments: Scaffolding lesson model for the experimental group, Conventional lesson model for the control group, Geometry Achievement Test (GAT) and Mathematics Anxiety Questionnaire (MAQ). The instruments were validated by three experts from two University. The reliability index of GAT and MAQ are 0.76 and 0.86 respectively. Research questions were answered through mean (M), standard deviation (SD), and mean difference, while a t-test at 0.05 level of significance was used to analyze the null hypotheses. The findings revealed that female students exposed to the scaffolding instruction method have higher mean scores than those exposed to the conventional instructional method. Based on the results, it is recommended, among others, that teaching mathematics, especially geometry, incorporate scaffolding instruction. Similarly, this method should be incorporated into the methodology and micro-teaching courses of pre-service teachers.

Journal of Instructional MathematicsVol. 5(2)
United Nations Children's Fund Niger (NE), Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Educational Research and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.