Selective focusing through target identification and experimental acoustic signature extraction: Through-aberration experiments

In the first part of this work (Rodriguez et al. 2016), the selective focusing through identification and experimental acoustic signature extraction (SelF-EASE) method was presented, and its potential for accurate ultrasound focusing was assessed via numerical experiments. In the second part of this work, the inversion procedure and focusing signal extraction are improved in terms of reliability and computation time, and experimental results are presented. First, the improved signature extraction process is evaluated with two experimental aluminum samples. Second, the improved focusing process is experimentally performed on a target immersed in water behind an unknown aberration layer. Compared with the time-of-flight methods, the measured intensity fields greatly improve in terms of accuracy without any further knowledge of the medium.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasonics
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2025.107605
Primary Topic
Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Selective focusing through target identification and experimental acoustic signature extraction: Through-aberration experiments

Samuel Rodríguez, Ali Mcheik, Adrien Arnaud, Garance Sauderais
Ultrasonics
Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
article

Selective focusing through target identification and experimental acoustic signature extraction: Through-aberration experiments

Samuel Rodríguez, Ali Mcheik, Adrien Arnaud, Garance Sauderais
article en

Abstract

In the first part of this work (Rodriguez et al. 2016), the selective focusing through identification and experimental acoustic signature extraction (SelF-EASE) method was presented, and its potential for accurate ultrasound focusing was assessed via numerical experiments. In the second part of this work, the inversion procedure and focusing signal extraction are improved in terms of reliability and computation time, and experimental results are presented. First, the improved signature extraction process is evaluated with two experimental aluminum samples. Second, the improved focusing process is experimentally performed on a target immersed in water behind an unknown aberration layer. Compared with the time-of-flight methods, the measured intensity fields greatly improve in terms of accuracy without any further knowledge of the medium.

UltrasonicsVol. 151
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.