Government trust in turbulence: how do natural disasters affect public risk perception in China?

In the context of frequent natural disasters, the public’s perception of risk has emerged as a critical social concern. This research, informed by the Social Amplification of Risk framework, delves into the influence of natural disaster shocks on the public’s risk perception, with a particular focus on the mediating role of government trust levels within China’s tiered system of trust. By leveraging micro-data from the Chinese Social Survey and macro-data on socio-economic progress spanning 2013, 2017, and 2021, empirical research has delineated a significant spillover effect of natural disaster shocks on the positive influence of public disaster risk perception. This impact transcends the risk perception of disasters, further amplifying the public’s awareness of societal risks, with the caveat that such spillover effects are finite in extent. Further mechanistic analyses reveal that government trust is crucial to mediating the relationship between disaster shocks and disaster/social risk perception. While grassroots and local government trust partially mediate this relationship, natural disaster shocks have no statistically significant indirect effect on public risk perception through central government trust. These findings underscore the externalities of risk shocks on public risk perceptions and provide valuable insights for enhancing the natural disaster preparedness system and promoting comprehensive natural disaster preparedness across society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Risk Research
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2025.2466533
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Government trust in turbulence: how do natural disasters affect public risk perception in China?

Shuang Ling, Jinlong Li, Jie Ni, Xiaozhou Liu
Journal of Risk Research
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Government trust in turbulence: how do natural disasters affect public risk perception in China?

Shuang Ling, Jinlong Li, Jie Ni, Xiaozhou Liu
article en

Abstract

In the context of frequent natural disasters, the public’s perception of risk has emerged as a critical social concern. This research, informed by the Social Amplification of Risk framework, delves into the influence of natural disaster shocks on the public’s risk perception, with a particular focus on the mediating role of government trust levels within China’s tiered system of trust. By leveraging micro-data from the Chinese Social Survey and macro-data on socio-economic progress spanning 2013, 2017, and 2021, empirical research has delineated a significant spillover effect of natural disaster shocks on the positive influence of public disaster risk perception. This impact transcends the risk perception of disasters, further amplifying the public’s awareness of societal risks, with the caveat that such spillover effects are finite in extent. Further mechanistic analyses reveal that government trust is crucial to mediating the relationship between disaster shocks and disaster/social risk perception. While grassroots and local government trust partially mediate this relationship, natural disaster shocks have no statistically significant indirect effect on public risk perception through central government trust. These findings underscore the externalities of risk shocks on public risk perceptions and provide valuable insights for enhancing the natural disaster preparedness system and promoting comprehensive natural disaster preparedness across society.

Journal of Risk ResearchVol. 27(11)
Zhongnan University of Economics and Law (CN), Hunan University (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.