Ethical and Practical Challenges in AI Integration for Education: Stakeholder Perspectives on Trust, Transparency, and Accountability

Artificial intelligence (AI) integration into education presents challenging ethical and practical issues as well as transforming possibilities for individualized learning, operational efficiency, and improved outcomes. This report investigates trust, transparency, algorithmic bias, and responsibility in AI-driven educational systems from the points of view of three hundred teachers, educators, and researchers around India. The results highlight a notable knowledge gap: Just 28.33% of respondents are highly familiar with artificial intelligence in education, while 32.67% are completely unfamiliar. Though 35% of respondents are unsure about data privacy policies, 41.67% of respondents believe AI can greatly improve educational outcomes, so they are cautiously optimistic. Only 27.67% of respondents said they were completely aware of how artificial intelligence systems use data. Thus, algorithmic bias became a major issue for 34% of respondents, along with general calls for transparency. The results highlight the need for human supervision since 35.67% of respondents support artificial intelligence use just under such circumstances. This paper comes to the conclusion that tackling these issues calls for strong ethical rules, professional growth to raise AI literacy, and inclusive models for transparency and responsibility. These steps are essential to guarantee fairness and confidence in AI integration, so opening the path for responsible application in learning environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovare Journal of Education
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2025v13i2.53957
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical and Practical Challenges in AI Integration for Education: Stakeholder Perspectives on Trust, Transparency, and Accountability

Anamika Pandey
2 citations
Innovare Journal of Education
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
article

Ethical and Practical Challenges in AI Integration for Education: Stakeholder Perspectives on Trust, Transparency, and Accountability

Anamika Pandey
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) integration into education presents challenging ethical and practical issues as well as transforming possibilities for individualized learning, operational efficiency, and improved outcomes. This report investigates trust, transparency, algorithmic bias, and responsibility in AI-driven educational systems from the points of view of three hundred teachers, educators, and researchers around India. The results highlight a notable knowledge gap: Just 28.33% of respondents are highly familiar with artificial intelligence in education, while 32.67% are completely unfamiliar. Though 35% of respondents are unsure about data privacy policies, 41.67% of respondents believe AI can greatly improve educational outcomes, so they are cautiously optimistic. Only 27.67% of respondents said they were completely aware of how artificial intelligence systems use data. Thus, algorithmic bias became a major issue for 34% of respondents, along with general calls for transparency. The results highlight the need for human supervision since 35.67% of respondents support artificial intelligence use just under such circumstances. This paper comes to the conclusion that tackling these issues calls for strong ethical rules, professional growth to raise AI literacy, and inclusive models for transparency and responsibility. These steps are essential to guarantee fairness and confidence in AI integration, so opening the path for responsible application in learning environments.

Innovare Journal of Education
Mahatma Gandhi Chitrakoot Gramodaya Vishwavidyalaya (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.