Local Cooling Enhancement in Incremental Impingement Pin-Fin Configurations: Role of Jet Diameter and Impingement Configurations

Abstract This study numerically investigates low aspect ratio incremental impingement configurations to evaluate the effect of jet hole size on both local and global heat transfer. The large eddy simulation (LES) model is developed based on the geometry and boundary conditions detailed by Busche et al. (2013, “Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop Measurements in High Solidity Pin Fin Cooling Arrays With Incremental Replenishment,” ASME J. Turbomach., 135(4), p. 041011). The model’s accuracy is validated by comparing its predictions with experimental results from the same study. The configuration consists of eight staggered rows of pin-fins with streamwise (X/D) and spanwise (S/D) spacings of 1.074 and 1.625, respectively, and a channel aspect ratio of 0.5D, where the pin-fin diameter (D) is 2.54 cm. Jets are directed into cut-out sections of the pin-fins to shield the jet stagnation region from crossflow. Coolant enters the pin-fin channels via five rows of jets, with four jet hole diameters: petite (P, 0.25D), small (S, 0.29D), medium (M, 0.36D), and large (L, 0.41D). The global Reynolds number, based on pin-fin diameter and maximum bulk velocity, is 7500. Twenty configurations are designed by varying the diameter of each jet row while keeping the others constant. The near-jet vortical structures are highlighted using isosurfaces of the Q-criterion. Jet mass velocities and mass flow rate distributions are compared across configurations. Row-by-row cooling parameters, as well as global Nusselt numbers and friction factors, are calculated to assess the relative advantages of each configuration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4068065
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Tribology and Lubrication Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Local Cooling Enhancement in Incremental Impingement Pin-Fin Configurations: Role of Jet Diameter and Impingement Configurations

F. E. Ames, Susheel Singh, Sumanta Acharya
2 citations
ASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
Tribology and Lubrication Engineering
1.43
article

Local Cooling Enhancement in Incremental Impingement Pin-Fin Configurations: Role of Jet Diameter and Impingement Configurations

F. E. Ames, Susheel Singh, Sumanta Acharya
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study numerically investigates low aspect ratio incremental impingement configurations to evaluate the effect of jet hole size on both local and global heat transfer. The large eddy simulation (LES) model is developed based on the geometry and boundary conditions detailed by Busche et al. (2013, “Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop Measurements in High Solidity Pin Fin Cooling Arrays With Incremental Replenishment,” ASME J. Turbomach., 135(4), p. 041011). The model’s accuracy is validated by comparing its predictions with experimental results from the same study. The configuration consists of eight staggered rows of pin-fins with streamwise (X/D) and spanwise (S/D) spacings of 1.074 and 1.625, respectively, and a channel aspect ratio of 0.5D, where the pin-fin diameter (D) is 2.54 cm. Jets are directed into cut-out sections of the pin-fins to shield the jet stagnation region from crossflow. Coolant enters the pin-fin channels via five rows of jets, with four jet hole diameters: petite (P, 0.25D), small (S, 0.29D), medium (M, 0.36D), and large (L, 0.41D). The global Reynolds number, based on pin-fin diameter and maximum bulk velocity, is 7500. Twenty configurations are designed by varying the diameter of each jet row while keeping the others constant. The near-jet vortical structures are highlighted using isosurfaces of the Q-criterion. Jet mass velocities and mass flow rate distributions are compared across configurations. Row-by-row cooling parameters, as well as global Nusselt numbers and friction factors, are calculated to assess the relative advantages of each configuration.

ASME Journal of Heat and Mass TransferVol. 147(6)
Louisiana State University (US), Illinois Institute of Technology (US), University of North Dakota (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Tribology and Lubrication Engineering
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Local Cooling Enhancement in Incremental Impingement Pin-Fin Configurations: Role of Jet Diameter and Impingement Configurations — F. E. Ames, Susheel Singh, et al. · ASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS