Value of clinical review for AI-guided deep vein thrombosis diagnosis with ultrasound imaging by non-expert operators

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) carries high morbidity, mortality, and costs globally. Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) image acquisition by non-ultrasound-trained providers, supported by an AI-based guidance and remote image review system, is believed to improve the timeliness and cost-effectiveness of diagnosis. We examine a database of 381 patients with suspected DVT who underwent an AI-guided ultrasound scan by a non-ultrasound-trained nurse and an expert sonographer-performed standard compression ultrasound scan. Each AI-guided scan was reviewed remotely by blinded radiologists or blinded independent POCUS-certified American Emergency Medicine (EM) physicians. Remote reviewer and standard scan diagnoses were compared. The primary endpoint is AI-guidance system sensitivity with clinician review; secondary endpoints include specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, image quality, inter-observer image quality, and vein compressibility agreement. Data was analysed through the bootstrapping method, bootstrapping with a second reader for each scan, and a majority voting system. Eighty percent (n = 304) of scans were of sufficient diagnostic quality. Radiologist reviewer sensitivity ranged from 90%-95%, specificity from 74%-84%, NPV from 98%-99%, PPV from 30%-42%, and potential expert-led ultrasound scans avoided from 39%-50%. Inter-observer agreement for image quality was 0.15 and for compressibility 0.61. EM reviewer sensitivity ranged from 95%-98%, specificity from 97%-100%, NPV was 99%, PPV from 81%-100%, and potential expert-led ultrasound scans avoided from 29%-38%. Inter-observer agreement for image quality was 0.59 and for compressibility 0.67. Diagnosing lower extremity DVT through AI-guided image acquisition with clinician review is feasible. Performance is influenced by reviewer expertise. We find potential positive impacts on health economics, including safely avoiding expert-led ultrasound scans.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01518-0
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Value of clinical review for AI-guided deep vein thrombosis diagnosis with ultrasound imaging by non-expert operators

Fouad Al-Noor, Sven Mischkewitz, Giancarlo Speranza, Bernhard Kainz
10 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
18.70
article

Value of clinical review for AI-guided deep vein thrombosis diagnosis with ultrasound imaging by non-expert operators

Fouad Al-Noor, Sven Mischkewitz, Giancarlo Speranza, Bernhard Kainz
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) carries high morbidity, mortality, and costs globally. Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) image acquisition by non-ultrasound-trained providers, supported by an AI-based guidance and remote image review system, is believed to improve the timeliness and cost-effectiveness of diagnosis. We examine a database of 381 patients with suspected DVT who underwent an AI-guided ultrasound scan by a non-ultrasound-trained nurse and an expert sonographer-performed standard compression ultrasound scan. Each AI-guided scan was reviewed remotely by blinded radiologists or blinded independent POCUS-certified American Emergency Medicine (EM) physicians. Remote reviewer and standard scan diagnoses were compared. The primary endpoint is AI-guidance system sensitivity with clinician review; secondary endpoints include specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, image quality, inter-observer image quality, and vein compressibility agreement. Data was analysed through the bootstrapping method, bootstrapping with a second reader for each scan, and a majority voting system. Eighty percent (n = 304) of scans were of sufficient diagnostic quality. Radiologist reviewer sensitivity ranged from 90%-95%, specificity from 74%-84%, NPV from 98%-99%, PPV from 30%-42%, and potential expert-led ultrasound scans avoided from 39%-50%. Inter-observer agreement for image quality was 0.15 and for compressibility 0.61. EM reviewer sensitivity ranged from 95%-98%, specificity from 97%-100%, NPV was 99%, PPV from 81%-100%, and potential expert-led ultrasound scans avoided from 29%-38%. Inter-observer agreement for image quality was 0.59 and for compressibility 0.67. Diagnosing lower extremity DVT through AI-guided image acquisition with clinician review is feasible. Performance is influenced by reviewer expertise. We find potential positive impacts on health economics, including safely avoiding expert-led ultrasound scans.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 8(1)
NYU Langone Health (US), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
18.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.