Validation and benchmarks for the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ III) in an Australian working population sample

The present study provides a high-level validation of the long version of COPSOQ, and thus supports its use as an instrument for research as well as psychosocial risk assessment and management in Australia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21845-x
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation and benchmarks for the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ III) in an Australian working population sample

Mark Rahimi, Philip Riley, Anthony D. LaMontagne, Ben Arnold
9 citations
BMC Public Health
Workplace Health and Well-being
25.34
article

Validation and benchmarks for the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ III) in an Australian working population sample

Mark Rahimi, Philip Riley, Anthony D. LaMontagne, Ben Arnold
article en
9 citations

Abstract

The present study provides a high-level validation of the long version of COPSOQ, and thus supports its use as an instrument for research as well as psychosocial risk assessment and management in Australia.

BMC Public HealthVol. 25(1)
Deakin University (AU)
Deakin University
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Workplace Health and Well-being
25.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.