Reducing Carbon Footprint and Costs in Healthcare: The Impact of Reverting to Pre-COVID Waste Management Practices

Background: Approximately 5% of NHS emissions are caused by waste and water use. During the COVID-19 pandemic, low-cost, energy-efficient waste streams were replaced with more energy- and carbon-intensive alternatives. After the pandemic, these changes were not reversed, leading to increased environmental and financial impacts. Methods: A 24-hour baseline audit of waste streams was conducted on a ward, categorizing waste into dry recycling, domestic, tiger-striped offensive, and clinical waste. Costs and equivalent carbon dioxide (eCO2) emissions were calculated based on the weight of each waste stream. In collaboration with infection control, waste streams were reverted to pre-COVID arrangements. A second audit was performed to reassess waste production, costs, and eCO2 emissions after implementation of the changes. Results: The baseline audit revealed no dry recycling and 5 kg of domestic waste, alongside 42.5 kg of offensive and 5 kg of clinical waste. After reverting to pre-COVID waste streams, dry recycling increased, while offensive and clinical waste production decreased significantly, leading to reduced costs and eCO2 emissions. Clinical waste, the most expensive and carbon-intensive stream, was halved, and the domestic-to-offensive waste ratio decreased by 0.8. Extrapolating these changes across the trust, we estimated annual savings of over £20,000 and a reduction of 17,000 kg eCO2. Conclusion: Reverting to pre-COVID waste management practices demonstrated substantial financial and carbon savings. These findings highlight the importance of sustainable waste management in reducing environmental impact and optimizing healthcare costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Impact Surgery
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62463/surgery.132
Primary Topic
Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reducing Carbon Footprint and Costs in Healthcare: The Impact of Reverting to Pre-COVID Waste Management Practices

Anne Hendry, Emily C. Liang, Ludger Barthelmes, Michelle Haughan
Impact Surgery
Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
article

Reducing Carbon Footprint and Costs in Healthcare: The Impact of Reverting to Pre-COVID Waste Management Practices

Anne Hendry, Emily C. Liang, Ludger Barthelmes, Michelle Haughan
article en

Abstract

Background: Approximately 5% of NHS emissions are caused by waste and water use. During the COVID-19 pandemic, low-cost, energy-efficient waste streams were replaced with more energy- and carbon-intensive alternatives. After the pandemic, these changes were not reversed, leading to increased environmental and financial impacts. Methods: A 24-hour baseline audit of waste streams was conducted on a ward, categorizing waste into dry recycling, domestic, tiger-striped offensive, and clinical waste. Costs and equivalent carbon dioxide (eCO2) emissions were calculated based on the weight of each waste stream. In collaboration with infection control, waste streams were reverted to pre-COVID arrangements. A second audit was performed to reassess waste production, costs, and eCO2 emissions after implementation of the changes. Results: The baseline audit revealed no dry recycling and 5 kg of domestic waste, alongside 42.5 kg of offensive and 5 kg of clinical waste. After reverting to pre-COVID waste streams, dry recycling increased, while offensive and clinical waste production decreased significantly, leading to reduced costs and eCO2 emissions. Clinical waste, the most expensive and carbon-intensive stream, was halved, and the domestic-to-offensive waste ratio decreased by 0.8. Extrapolating these changes across the trust, we estimated annual savings of over £20,000 and a reduction of 17,000 kg eCO2. Conclusion: Reverting to pre-COVID waste management practices demonstrated substantial financial and carbon savings. These findings highlight the importance of sustainable waste management in reducing environmental impact and optimizing healthcare costs.

Impact SurgeryVol. 2(2)
Cumberland Infirmary (GB), North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.